Hello,
Regarding the sponsorship brochure:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debconf-data/dc14/sponsorship-brochure/brochure.en.pdf
I have a few comments which are mostly details.
1) page 3
DebConf and Debian
The Bigger Picture
There is an issue with DebConf6 which is separated on two line and h
(resend with the correct debconf-team address)
Hi Raphael,
Responses in-lined below.
On 11/03/2013 03:05 AM, Raphaël Walther wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added debconf-team in CC.
>
> Thanks for writing and for the good work! I have read the sponsorship
> brochure again.
>
> I have a few comments whic
Hi Tony,
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:11:00AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> (resend with the correct debconf-team address)
Sorry, my mistake.
> On 11/03/2013 03:05 AM, Raphaël Walther wrote:
[...]
> > 2) I am concerned about these details at the end:
> >
> > "DebConf has evolved from humble beginni
Hello,
I don't think it is good for us to have two lists serving the same purpose. I
don't remember exactly what was the idea behind creating a separate list but
I'd suggest to drop one of them.
Any thoughts ?
Cheers,
Raphaël
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Hi,
On Sun Nov 03, 2013 at 21:45:58 +0100, Raphaël Walther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't think it is good for us to have two lists serving the same purpose. I
> don't remember exactly what was the idea behind creating a separate list but
> I'd suggest to drop one of them.
debconf14-team is the lo
On 10/28/2013 10:37 AM, Patty Langasek wrote:
http://www.lohutok.net/gallery/debconf14/sky_swirl_style_tile.png
Looks good! Print it!
The full site launched Thursday night.
http://debconf14.debconf.org
I'd appreciate any eyes to check out the pages, verify dates and
details, especially s
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:45:58PM +0100, Raphaël Walther wrote:
> I don't think it is good for us to have two lists serving the same
> purpose. I don't remember exactly what was the idea behind creating a
> separate list but I'd suggest to drop one of them.
> Any thoughts ?
The original motivat
