Hi,
On Dienstag, 4. September 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > no. We only count money (or directly valuable ressources, usually things)
> > into account for sponsoring.
> >
> > (I guesstimate) Half of the orgateam is freelancing, listing them as
> > sponsors is... pointless or even totally besides
On 05/09/12 09:31, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 4. September 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> no. We only count money (or directly valuable ressources, usually things)
>>> into account for sponsoring.
>>>
>>> (I guesstimate) Half of the orgateam is freelancing, listing them as
>>> spo
Daniel, that's really getting ridiculous.
Le mercredi, 5 septembre 2012 13.30:17, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
> While I understand all of your points, I also think we should look at it
> from the other side:
>
> - Company A chooses to hire DDs, let them attend DebConf on work time,
> maybe even pay t
Daniel Pocock writes:
>> ok, to be clearer: its not just pointless or besides the point, its outright
>> harmful. (Starting with this discussion even...)
>
> If someone makes a contribution to Debian or DebConf, why is it harmful
> to recognise them?
Maybe it's only because I use a thread based
Hi Daniel,
I will ignore your input regarding sponsorship from now, it's a waste of my
time. I'd appreciate if you could find other areas in DebConf to work
on^w^wdiscuss about (as you have clearly shown that you have little
understanding how sponsoring and DebConf works).
"New input and ideas
On 05/09/12 14:28, Holger Levsen wrote:
> problem per se. What is a problem is that you seem to insist on your ideas...
I don't mean to `insist' or `rant' about any one idea, nor waste
anybody's time (mine is no less valuable than yours)
However, when I see a comment such as your choice of the w
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:33:26AM +0200]:
> (...)↓
> I don't think that the "economical effort" should be part of the
> ranking. First, it's very hard to quantify, because you need to consider
> at least: income, general cost of living, family & other recurring
> expenses, does a
Daniel Pocock dijo [Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 08:13:43PM +0200]:
> >> Actually, that is an interesting point
> >
> > no, its a boring old point...
> >
> >> If somebody's employer gives them a week of work time to attend DebConf,
> >> should that company be recognised as a sponsor?
> >
> > no. We only
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:20:15PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:06:39PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 29. August 2012, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > > + SUPPORTER
> > > + Logo on our website
> >
> > this is plain wrong, please fix ASAP.
> >
