Hi,
On Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2009, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> One possible solution is to have them all interruptranslated (i.e. the
> speaker and the translator say a phrase at a time). We could, if the
> facilities are OK for that, sit people in two different rooms, and
> have a simultaneous translation
i have 30 rooms more in "Albergue" book it?
http://www.alberguecaceres.es/
sleep + brackfast 18€
salud
--
Anto Recio
Debconf 9[Local Team]
"People power online"
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.
Hi,
On Freitag, 5. Juni 2009, Richard Darst wrote:
> I really wish I wasn't replying to myself so much since it makes me
> seem crazy[0], but I'd like to point out that if you extremely dislike
> the idea of pushing the deadline, it would be more productive to push
> for the sponsorship meeting on
Anto Recio wrote:
> i have 30 rooms more in "Albergue" book it?
>
> http://www.alberguecaceres.es/
>
> sleep + brackfast 18€
>
I would suggest waiting until after the reconfirmation deadline.
According to
http://munin.debconf.org/debconf.org/skinner.debconf.org-penta_attendee.html
there are c
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 03:49:07PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>Do we have any idea about what's available and what's needed for
>network infrastructure yet? I've got a firm offer of network switches
>(and probably cables) if that's useful. What is the setup at the venue
>like?
And I
the next week, holguer and me will going to teh residences and venue for
this issues
salud
Steve McIntyre escribió:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 03:49:07PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Do we have any idea about what's available and what's needed for
>> network infrastructure
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Anto Recio wrote:
> the next week, holguer and me will going to teh residences and venue for
> this issues
Cool, that will be a big help! :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Is there anybody out there?
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:38:38AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Freitag, 5. Juni 2009, Richard Darst wrote:
>> I really wish I wasn't replying to myself so much since it makes me
>> seem crazy[0], but I'd like to point out that if you extremely dislike
>> the idea of pushing the deadline,
Holas,
On Freitag, 5. Juni 2009, Anto Recio wrote:
> the next week, holguer and me will going to teh residences and venue for
> this issues
please feel free to fill up my todo list for that at
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/User:h01ger but keep it sensible :-)
(and it will be the week starting in
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:57:33PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >Moving the deadline a week aint thaaat bad, IMO.
>
> I don't think we have any option, to be honest. Best time we have so
> far for the meeting looks like Sunday afternoon (UTC).
OK, on IRC there are some objections to moving it
Holger Levsen dijo [Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:38:38AM +0200]:
> > I really wish I wasn't replying to myself so much since it makes me
> > seem crazy[0], but I'd like to point out that if you extremely dislike
> > the idea of pushing the deadline, it would be more productive to push
> > for the sponso
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:28:41AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:57:33PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> >Moving the deadline a week aint thaaat bad, IMO.
>>
>> I don't think we have any option, to be honest. Best time we have so
>> far for the meeting looks like Sunday
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I don't think we have a better plan at the moment. I'd be tempted to
> not actually announce the deadline move, though, and just to give
> people the extra leeway without telling them unless they've already
> asked individually...
>
Sure.
Equally if we extend the deadlin
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:04:38PM +0200, Moray Allan wrote:
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > I don't think we have a better plan at the moment. I'd be tempted to
> > not actually announce the deadline move, though, and just to give
> > people the extra leeway without telling them unless they've already
Le jeudi 04 juin 2009 à 16:03 -0400, Richard Darst a écrit :
> The purpose of the early registration is to be able to know our budget
> and do long-term planning. We *did* budget for these people to have
> hosted accommodations, so it won't make the conference impossible.
If we've been including
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:00:20PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:04:38PM +0200, Moray Allan wrote:
>> Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> > I don't think we have a better plan at the moment. I'd be tempted to
>> > not actually announce the deadline move, though, and just to give
>> >
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:24:50PM -0400, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
>Richard Darst wrote:
>> What do you all think?
>
>I think fixing this on a contacting these people and fixing it on a case
>by case basis is a sane thing to do. Some people have difficulty using
>Penta for whatever reason.
+1
Hi,
On Freitag, 5. Juni 2009, Richard Darst wrote:
> Sure, but I would say to announce it soon (via direct mail) to those
> who are waiting on sponsorship
it's also those who submitted talks...
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:28:16PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Freitag, 5. Juni 2009, Richard Darst wrote:
> > Sure, but I would say to announce it soon (via direct mail) to those
> > who are waiting on sponsorship
>
> it's also those who submitted talks...
All talks have been deci
Hi,
On Samstag, 6. Juni 2009, Richard Darst wrote:
> All talks have been decided, correct? What is left is Debian Day,
> which would be fair to wait for...
>
> Have talk submitters been notified to check penta for talk status ?
if so, I'd greatly appreciate a public schedule...
(and yes, i'm aw
On Samstag, 6. Juni 2009, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:28:16PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Have talk submitters been notified to check penta for talk status ?
I haven't...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:25:14AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> So, it looks like travel sponsorship decisions will come *very* close
> to the reconfirmation deadline. Given the delay in sending out
> emails, it could even be decided before the deadline but not emailed
> out on ti
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:03:23PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> So Ganneff and I and others prodded the database today to get some
> statistics on the "-- please select one--" attendees, to figure out
> what to do.
GAH, I replied to the wrong thread with my proposed wording.
OK, another try to have a proposed wording in the right thread:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:25:14AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> So, it looks like travel sponsorship decisions will come *very* close
> to the reconfirmation deadline. Given the delay in sending out
> emails, it coul
Le vendredi 05 juin 2009 à 19:12 -0400, Richard Darst a écrit :
> You need to reply to this email within a week to be put back into the
> sponsored category.
>From what you said, they never actually selected sponsorship, so it
shouldn't be 'back' here. (I'm not sure about saying it was a 'such a
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 07:29:49PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
>OK, another try to have a proposed wording in the right thread:
>
>On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:25:14AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> So, it looks like travel sponsorship decisions will come *very* close
>> to the reco
Hi
When I logged in today into penta to reconfirm my attendance I was a bit
surprised to see that my talk has been silently rejected. I thought that
I would at least receive an explanation by mail if the talk gets
rejected. At the moment I don't know why the talk was rejected.
I admit that the i
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 12:33:52AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 07:29:49PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> >What do you think? Permissions or requests for me to send it
> >(assuming I get the right emails?)
>
> Go for it.
Done.
- Richard
--
| Richard Darst - rkd@
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 01:31:39AM +0200, Moray Allan wrote:
> Le vendredi 05 juin 2009 à 19:12 -0400, Richard Darst a écrit :
> > You need to reply to this email within a week to be put back into the
> > sponsored category.
>
> >From what you said, they never actually selected sponsorship, so it
Hello Gaudenz,
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 01:20:30AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Hi
>
> When I logged in today into penta to reconfirm my attendance I was a bit
> surprised to see that my talk has been silently rejected. I thought that
> I would at least receive an explanation by mail if the t
30 matches
Mail list logo
