Hello all,
I've started to think that heavy use of IRC for organising
this conference is more of a curse than a blessing. The
ability to rapid-fire questions and decisions between team
members offers a short term convenience but means there's
virtually no record of what's going on bar backlogs for
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 02:45:29PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I've started to think that heavy use of IRC for organising
>this conference is more of a curse than a blessing. The
>ability to rapid-fire questions and decisions between team
>members offers a short term convenience but me
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 02:45:29PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've started to think that heavy use of IRC for organising
> this conference is more of a curse than a blessing. The
> ability to rapid-fire questions and decisions between team
> members offers a short term convenience
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:44:43PM +, Kevin Campbell
wrote:
> I would suggest that we try and improve matters by getting
> people involved in key areas to publish regular status
> reports / updates on the list. I'm going to be doing this
> for teviot as of next week, so perhaps that will get th
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:11:32PM +, Moray Allan wrote:
> The next meeting will be on Monday (19 March), at 20 UTC.
> This is about 12 weeks before DebConf starts.
>
> As usual see
> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf7/Meetings for the
> agenda.
I'm going to have to leave apologies for thi
