[Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Fabian Fagerholm
Hi, While discussing and planning future DebConfs is certainly exciting and, er... entertaining, there are those of us who recognise the importance of wrapping up already started work. Now that the dust seems to have settled temporarily, I'd like to know what tasks people still have pending from D

[Debconf-team] DebConf 7 montly meeting - seeking for proper dates

2006-07-25 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! During preparation phase for next DebConf meetings have been proven very usefull (and sometimes even entertaining ;) Since some people newly joined the team (or are about to do so), we should see, if our current prefered dating scheme still fits. So far we always met on Mondays at 19:00 UTC.

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf 7 montly meeting - seeking for proper dates

2006-07-25 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/2006 07:47 AM, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Hi! > > During preparation phase for next DebConf meetings have been > proven very usefull (and sometimes even entertaining ;) > > Since some people newly joined the team (or are about to do so), we

Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/2006 06:45 AM, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: [...] > It's somewhat unclear to me who is running the show at the moment and > how the above tasks fit into the overall goals of that/those person(s). > I would welcome more clarity here, especially from

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf 7 montly meeting - seeking for proper dates

2006-07-25 Thread Bdale Garbee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexander Schmehl) writes: > Bonus points, if you can propose meeting times, which are okay for Bdale > (I think UTC-7) and aj (UTC+10?). I'm actually UTC-6 this time of year. Regardless, don't worry about my schedule... it's pretty chaotic. Pick a time that's good for the *r

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf 7 montly meeting - seeking for proper dates

2006-07-25 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:47:22PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > If you would like to contribute to debconf and therefore attend our > meetings as well but can't make it on Mondays at 19:00 UTC please speak > up *NOW*! I resume classes for the upcoming schoolyear on September 5. Starting then

Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060725 14:57]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/25/2006 06:45 AM, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > [...] > > It's somewhat unclear to me who is running the show at the moment and > > how the above tasks fit into the overal

Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Andreas Barth
* Andreas Schuldei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060725 21:36]: > * Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060725 14:57]: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 07/25/2006 06:45 AM, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > > [...] > > > It's somewhat unclear to me who is running t

Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 10726 March 1977, Andreas Schuldei wrote: >> Could we still ask Andreas help on these [1]list? I think it >> should be a good way to have a more complete list and to find out >> the right status of each task. Perhaps Andreas could help us to >> finish the DebConf6 tasks (even off-list or i

Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Joerg Jaspert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060725 22:50]: > On 10726 March 1977, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > >>Could we still ask Andreas help on these [1]list? I think it > >> should be a good way to have a more complete list and to find out > >> the right status of each task. Perhaps Andreas could

Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > I am sure there are people who disagree with that, but then it is > my perception that counts in this regard, because it is also my > time and my engery. It's your decision to refuse to complete the job that you willingly took o

Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
Andreas, On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > So the removed authority (and corresponding responsibility) was > in no way only limited to the debconf7 location but rather about > debconf in general. Right now I'm not going to address the issue of whether you should

Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060725 23:21]: > I am sure there are people who disagree with that, but then it is > my perception that counts in this regard, because it is also my > time and my engery. Yes, it is your time, energy and decission. And yes, we accept your decission.

Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Safir Secerovic
Hi Jimmy, you used the right words, it "appears" and it "seems" to you that this was a "status quo" state, but it might not have reflected the state as it has actually been in. Regards, Safir > Andreas, > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: >> So the removed auth

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf 7 montly meeting - seeking for proper dates

2006-07-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:47:22PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > >If you would like to contribute to debconf and therefore attend our >meetings as well but can't make it on Mondays at 19:00 UTC please speak >up *NOW*! Monday, 19:00 UTC is normally fine for me... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge,

Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6

2006-07-25 Thread Aschwin van der Woude
I'll use this email to reply and voice my opinion on this discussion. On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 23:58 +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Hi! > > * Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060725 23:21]: > > > I am sure there are people who disagree with that, but then it is > > my perception that count