Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:47:07PM +0100]:
> > The meeting shall take plae on Wednesday 17, 18:30.
> >
> > People from both bidding teams, *please confirm* you can attend at
> > that time. If you cannot, please state if you can attend 1hr later
> > (19:30). If that's not do
Hi all,
Le mercredi, 10 février 2016, 13.42:35 Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
> Holger Levsen dijo [Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:01:47AM +0100]:
> > So far, February 17th looks like a date I would pick.
>
> The meeting shall take plae on Wednesday 17, 18:30.
>
> People from both bidding teams, *please confirm
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:42:35PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> - The meeting is not supposed to be long, but a scheme limited to 1hr
> can be less than ideal (as Neil cannot attend Thursday >19:30)
If it's better, I can re-arrange some stuff for the Thursday, but that
may just be complicating th
On 2016-02-10 14:42, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> People from both bidding teams, *please confirm* you can attend at
> that time.
We just talked about it on our IRC channel and a few of us can make it
so it should be fine for us.
>
> Of course, both bidding teams: Please do confirm whether you are still
Sorry for the noise - 18:30UTC.
12:30 Mexico, 13:30 Montreal, 14:30 Nova Scotia, 18:30 UK, 19:30 most
of Europe (including Prague), 20:30 South Africa. Did I miss any of
you? :)
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.de
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> One more person voted. And yes, time is passing by quickly. And
> whatever we choose, only the Committee has voted — we have not heard a
> word from either the Prague or the Montreal groups.
Ugh, I didn't put in any time... sorry...
> The m
Holger Levsen dijo [Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:01:47AM +0100]:
> so far only 6 people have voted in this dudle poll - so if you haven't please
> vote now.
>
> That said, I'm a bit unsure about the timing, as I think such a meeting needs
> at least 7 days warning in advance, which already invalidate
Hi,
On Sonntag, 24. Januar 2016, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Dear DebConf Team, dear DebConf Committee, dear DPL,
>
> I consider the DebConf Committee to be validly formed, with this page as
> reference:
> https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf_Committee
>
> The 7 persons from the 'Confir
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 05:13:46PM +0100]:
> Dear DebConf Team, dear DebConf Committee, dear DPL,
>
> I consider the DebConf Committee to be validly formed, with this page as
> reference:
> https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf_Committee
>
> The 7 persons from the '
martin f krafft dijo [Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:48:26AM +1300]:
> also sprach Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [2016-01-27 03:56 +1300]:
> > > I was trying to not diverge too much away from the process. But
> > > if there's no strong objection to skipping directly to the Bid
> > > Decision Meeting, that works f
On 2016-01-24 17:23, martin f krafft wrote:
The wiki lists three purposes for this meeting:
1. Introductions from teams and their members.
2. Questions from teams about the process, and about what others
suggest they try to do on any uncertain aspects or potential
problems.
3.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:48:26AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [2016-01-27 03:56 +1300]:
> > > I was trying to not diverge too much away from the process. But
> > > if there's no strong objection to skipping directly to the Bid
> > > Decision Meeting, that work
also sprach Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [2016-01-27 03:56 +1300]:
> > I was trying to not diverge too much away from the process. But
> > if there's no strong objection to skipping directly to the Bid
> > Decision Meeting, that works for me too!
>
> As far as I can remember this was a tragic experience.
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:02:24PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>> Hi Martin, hi all,
>> >
>> > Are there any reasons for why we couldn't all read the wiki pages
>> > (again), engage in a bit more dialogue on the list and simply call
>> > for a final
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:02:24PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>> Hi Martin, hi all,
>> >
>> > Are there any reasons for why we couldn't all read the wiki pages
>> > (again), engage in a bit more dialogue on the list and simply call
>> > for a final
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:02:24PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Hi Martin, hi all,
> >
> > Are there any reasons for why we couldn't all read the wiki pages
> > (again), engage in a bit more dialogue on the list and simply call
> > for a final decision meeting in the near future, e.g.
Hi Martin, hi all,
Le lundi, 25 janvier 2016, 06.23:44 martin f krafft a écrit :
> As you know, I am not involved in the DC17 decision process, even
> though I sent the reminder to the teams in November. But I am
> obviously following closely and with great interest, and I do wonder
> about the bi
Hi Didier,
I know how busy you are with the other new responsibilities you've
recently took on. Thanks a lot for taking on this onorous task and
re-forming the committee.
As you know, I am not involved in the DC17 decision process, even
though I sent the reminder to the teams in November. But I a
Dear DebConf Team, dear DebConf Committee, dear DPL,
I consider the DebConf Committee to be validly formed, with this page as
reference:
https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf_Committee
The 7 persons from the 'Confirmed for the DC17 decision' list have
acknowledged my request for confirm
Daniel Pocock dijo [Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 06:29:51PM +0100]:
> On 20/12/15 18:18, Allison Randal wrote:
> > On 12/19/2015 01:09 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> On 18/12/15 14:48, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> >>(...)
> >> Freezing the decision process may also be a practical way of emphasizing
> >> to
On 20/12/15 18:18, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 12/19/2015 01:09 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 18/12/15 14:48, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>>> Given the general "DebConf Team" situation, I would really like us to
>>> focus on using the existing structures for what they got built, rather
>>> than h
On 12/19/2015 01:09 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 18/12/15 14:48, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>>
>> Given the general "DebConf Team" situation, I would really like us to
>> focus on using the existing structures for what they got built, rather
>> than having meta-discussions, which will only dela
On 18/12/15 14:48, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le jeudi, 17 décembre 2015, 12.49:32 Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
>> As Didier said already replying to Steve, I am among the people
>> responding "yes" to the call. There is one bit that I do feel
>> important: We can reach a consensus as to which bid is
Le jeudi, 17 décembre 2015, 12.49:32 Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
> As Didier said already replying to Steve, I am among the people
> responding "yes" to the call. There is one bit that I do feel
> important: We can reach a consensus as to which bid is more apt in our
> eyes, but formally, we don't have a
Richard Hartmann dijo [Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 07:57:01PM +0100]:
> Quoting in full on purpose.
>
> Can DPL just tell the committee to do this on its own this once?
That, or put a delegation in place before mid January. Or come up with
a different, sustainable scheme.
___
Quoting in full on purpose.
Can DPL just tell the committee to do this on its own this once?
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
On Dec 17, 2015 19:49, "Gunnar Wolf" wrote:
> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:07:22PM +0100]:
> > Dear DebConf Team,
> >
> > Please be awar
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:07:22PM +0100]:
> Dear DebConf Team,
>
> Please be aware that the DebConf17 bids deadline has now passed and that
> there are two bidders:
> (...)
> I suggest to proceed this way: if there are blockers, for the two Bid
> teams or some DebConf Co
Le mercredi, 16 décembre 2015, 13.45:15 Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:07:22PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > As announced in [1], I have now contacted all "Current members" from
> > [0] to check whether they would keep serving on the DebConf
> > Committee. I hope to
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:07:22PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> As announced in [1], I have now contacted all "Current members" from [0]
> to check whether they would keep serving on the DebConf Committee. I
> hope to hear from them all before the end of the year [2].
> [0] https://wiki.
29 matches
Mail list logo
