Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-22 Thread Daniel Lange
Am 22.07.2015 um 12:53 schrieb martin f krafft: The last bit does require us to climb 400m of height, which hardly classifies as extreme sports. And never does a beer taste as good as after a bit of exercise! ;) There is nothing more pleasing than sitting next to a group of sweating men, half o

Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-22 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michael Banck [2015-07-22 12:02 +0200]: > I know this might complicate planning ahead further, but I would assume > that quite a few people would like to hike there if the weather permits. > Certainly I would. Yes, I also hope someone not keen on hiking will volunteer to herd the mass

Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-22 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 04:33:51PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > the number of people registered for conf dinner is now >+25% of the > initial plans, and we need to rethink to adjust for this new size. I know this might complicate planning ahead further, but I would assume that quite a few

Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-14 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [2015-07-10 10:15 +0200]: > Everything's in Git. Currently we have 7 busses reserved at 290 € > each including the return journey. Wtf, I have no idea why this e-mail only just went through the list. That explains a bit why I could not find it and why people didn't kno

Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-14 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2015-07-10 09:59 +0200]: > BTW on your original mail you forgot to include much relevant > information, so that whole team can make a choice: > > - What are the prices of the various options? Everything's in Git. Currently we have 7 busses reserved at 290 € each in

Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach <> [2015-07-10 10:15 +0200]: > > - What about the return journey? > > Traffic will be much less and we have more time / less pressure. The > idea is that busses are available from 21:00 and each 20 seater just > leaves when full and then comes back, until the last tour at 23:00 > (may

Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach <> [2015-07-10 10:15 +0200]: > > - What about the return journey? > > Traffic will be much less and we have more time / less pressure. The > idea is that busses are available from 21:00 and each 20 seater just > leaves when full and then comes back, until the last tour at 23:00 > (may

Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-10 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
Hello Martin, On 09.07.2015 15:05, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach martin f krafft [2015-07-08 16:33 +0200]: >> 2. I've inquired whether we could have 2–3 additional 20-seaters >> so that we could ferry 120–160 people in each go, meaning we >> could do it in 3 runs. > > We can h

Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [2015-07-08 16:33 +0200]: > 2. I've inquired whether we could have 2–3 additional 20-seaters > so that we could ferry 120–160 people in each go, meaning we > could do it in 3 runs. We can have two additional busses and I think this just makes sense given th

Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2015-07-08 18:16 +0200]: > Would it simplify the logistic and the costs if we move daytrip > date or conference dinner date, so that we have both events on the > same days, with (partly) the same buses? So far, the day trip people have not requested any busses, and

Re: [Debconf-team] Conf dinner logistics challenge

2015-07-08 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 08.07.2015 16:33, martin f krafft wrote: > I am strongly in favour of (3) if we get additional busses. If not, > then we'll have to work with (1). I don't think (2) is going to > improve things enough. > > I also believe 1.5km is a reasonable distance to walk once — we > won't have the problem