First of all, thanks for the penta hacking :-)
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:19:06AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> I just added the field. It is on the "Travel" tab, as a textarea labeled
> "What are you doing for Debian? Why do you request sponsorship?"
>
> Now, if someone could prepare a mail
On 11728 March 1977, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> All those fields rated from 1 to 5 right? How about:
Yes.
> Contributor:
> 1 - Seldomly
> 2 - Regular
> 3 - Active
> 4 - Very Active / Orga team
> 5 - Extra point for people organizing events/Talks/BOFs at debconf.
> Members are supposed to
> Requ
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> All those fields rated from 1 to 5 right? How about:
> Contributor:
> 1 - Seldomly
Seldom
> 2 - Regular
> 3 - Active
> 4 - Very Active / Orga team
> 5 - Extra point for people organizing events/Talks/BOFs at debconf.
This would be: DebConf
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:20:09PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11721 March 1977, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> >> > process. Committee process people in penta using the voting system and
> >> > then
> >> > have a meeting to talk about the results. Last year, he had two
> >> > meetings, and
>
On 11721 March 1977, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>> > process. Committee process people in penta using the voting system and then
>> > have a meeting to talk about the results. Last year, he had two meetings,
>> > and
>> > some people did not have enough time and look on the debian's involvement
>> > of
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 04:03:09PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:24:15PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> >[you are reading this again because i sent it firstl by mistake to the wrong
> >list...]
>
> Doh! :-P
>
> >Also, I think marga or gunnar, not sure now, pro
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> If we're getting to this stage, then something has gone wrong with the
> travel sponsorship already. People are expected (and told) to just
> list the amount they *must* have sponsorship for in order to be able
> to travel. Given that, offe
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:24:15PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>[you are reading this again because i sent it firstl by mistake to the wrong
>list...]
Doh! :-P
>Also, I think marga or gunnar, not sure now, proposed to fund only a percent
>of the requested amount. And instead of start with the ord
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:48:02AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> > Second, Tincho suggested having the process a bit similar to the papers
> > process. Committee process people in penta using the voting system and then
> > have a meet
Margarita Manterola dijo [Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:48:02AM -0300]:
> (...SNAP...)
> So that the maximum number granted is min(your request, maximum for
> your zone). This should be done outside of the meetings, just agree
> on the maximum numbers, and then fix the numbers for whoever asked
> more.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> Second, Tincho suggested having the process a bit similar to the papers
> process. Committee process people in penta using the voting system and then
> have a meeting to talk about the results. Last year, he had two meetings, and
> some peopl
Ana Guerrero dijo [Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:24:15PM +0200]:
> Also, I think marga or gunnar, not sure now, proposed to fund only a percent
> of the requested amount. And instead of start with the ordered list of
> people and fund so far as the money reaches, start funding a 20 % of all the
> people
[you are reading this again because i sent it firstl by mistake to the wrong
list...]
Hi,
Last year, in the sponsorship allocation team we had several discussions of
how to improve the process. This year it might be late for some changes, but
we still can improve it and make it more transparent.
13 matches
Mail list logo
