Hi,
On Montag, 10. März 2014, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I rather read the rule as "not the same continent twice", so Asia
> could follow both Americas or Europe.
Same here.
And to answer Martins question: true, it's not a strict rule, but... "very
strong preference".
cheers,
Holger
sig
also sprach Andreas Barth [2014-03-10 10:04 +0100]:
> I rather read the rule as "not the same continent twice", so Asia
> could follow both Americas or Europe.
Which "rule" are you speaking of?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: h
* Patty Langasek (harmo...@dodds.net) [140310 05:35]:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:17:11PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez [2014-03-04 18:38 +0100]:
>
> > > DC16 is closer :)
>
> > Assuming we get equivalent bids from the Americas and Scandinavia
> > for DC16, wo
also sprach Patty Langasek [2014-03-10 05:34 +0100]:
> That said, I think an Asia or Australian bid should be considered
> regardless of what year cycle we're on.
Agreed, though the problem here is obviously travel sponsorship. But
this is really trivially solved: DC14 and DC15 have to make massi
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:17:11PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez [2014-03-04 18:38 +0100]:
> > DC16 is closer :)
> Assuming we get equivalent bids from the Americas and Scandinavia
> for DC16, would the committee favour the former because
> traditionally, {DCx |
also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez [2014-03-04 18:38 +0100]:
> > DC17 is not that far away really...or? =)
>
> DC16 is closer :)
Assuming we get equivalent bids from the Americas and Scandinavia
for DC16, would the committee favour the former because
traditionally, {DCx | x%2==0} has been on the oth
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:49:06PM +0100, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> DC17 is not that far away really...or? =)
DC16 is closer :)
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Martin Bagge / brother dijo [Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:49:06PM +0100]:
> Hi
> The group for the Swedish bid did a discussion about the needed updates.
> We did indeed oversee the need of a firm budget and having reliable
> numbers presented at this stage was not possible. It would also not be
> fair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
The group for the Swedish bid did a discussion about the needed updates.
We did indeed oversee the need of a firm budget and having reliable
numbers presented at this stage was not possible. It would also not be
fair to either the broader public n
