On Wednesday 09 February 2011, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> So ideally, you would not see in penta the rating of the people until
> everybody in the commitee has rated them. This does not mean you can not
> see Develpoer Jane and Developer Joe already rated Developer Bernard,
> you just don't see what the
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> First, on anonymizing the requesters: I am _against_ it. It might seem
metoo
> Second, on anonimyzing the committee (the herb@ members): Not showing
> who casted each opinion in Penta is near to trivial (heck, even a
> small CSS trick would
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 05:07:25PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > OTOH, on a complex project, I know about the level of involvement some
> > people have on some topics. I don't know about many others. And yes, I
> > do let other voters' votes influence mine.
>
> Yeah, but you never know if other's
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:01:21AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Ana Guerrero dijo [Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:51:03AM +0100]:
> > > Hiding them to help people not be influenced by the previous raters
> > > sounds like a pretty good idea. The idea here wouldn't be anonymity,
> > > just to help people r
Ana Guerrero dijo [Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:51:03AM +0100]:
> > Hiding them to help people not be influenced by the previous raters
> > sounds like a pretty good idea. The idea here wouldn't be anonymity,
> > just to help people remain unbiased and make independent choices.
> > Raters would know th
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 04:28:15AM -0500, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:29:36PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> > Second, on anonimyzing the committee (the herb@ members): Not showing
> > who casted each opinion in Penta is near to trivial (heck, even a
> > small CSS trick would
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:29:36PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Second, on anonimyzing the committee (the herb@ members): Not showing
> who casted each opinion in Penta is near to trivial (heck, even a
> small CSS trick would do), although it does not gain us much. If
> people feel seeing other com
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:29:36PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> First, on anonymizing the requesters: I am _against_ it. It might seem
> I want sponsorship to favor the group of people we meet regularly -
> But no, I want to favor people we know and acknowledge have worked
> most and are most valuab
Moray Allan dijo [Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:46:28PM +]:
> We had a DebConf11 meeting this evening. Minutes and logs are here:
>
> http://meetbot.debian.net/debconf-team/2011/debconf-team.2011-02-08-20.01.html
> http://meetbot.debian.net/debconf-team/2011/debconf-team.2011-02-08-20.01.log.html
>
We had a DebConf11 meeting this evening. Minutes and logs are here:
http://meetbot.debian.net/debconf-team/2011/debconf-team.2011-02-08-20.01.html
http://meetbot.debian.net/debconf-team/2011/debconf-team.2011-02-08-20.01.log.html
The next meeting will be in two weeks' time, at 20 UTC on Tuesday
10 matches
Mail list logo
