also sprach martin f krafft [2017-05-15 15:57 +0200]:
> I think you are referring to the currently valid CoC:
>
> https://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml
Ftr, since there's some confusion… this is the current CoC. The
original proposal is available here:
https://storm.debian.net/shared/RSXP
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2017-05-15 15:37 +0200]:
> I also don't like such list. First, who will enforce it? DPL?
> Anti-harassment or organizers?
This — incidence response — is in part what we have to define.
Someone needs to have the power to enforce the rules, attendees need
to display t
[using this mail to reply Martin, so that I have all CC]
> El 15/05/17 a las 15:07, martin f krafft escribió:
>> The original proposal listed a number of potential consequences to
>> offences, among other more concrete incidence response processes.
>>
>> What's the reason you didn't include those
Resending CC'ing anti-harassment, so the anti-harassment team has the
whole thread.
Regards
Mensaje reenviado
Asunto: Re: [Debconf-team] Revision of DebConf CoC
Fecha: Mon, 15 May 2017 15:22:32 +0200
De: Laura Arjona Reina
Responder a: larj...@debian.org
Para: debconf-team@lis
