On Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2012, Richard Darst wrote:
> Another random thing: According to "the plan", we should send the DC11
> surplus back to debian:
>
> - For SPI, this is a no-op since there is no separate accounting.
>
> - For FFIS,
same. there is just earmarking, but its the same account.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:36:16PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:16:11PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> > These two messages describe our current monetary status:
> > http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20120612.164231.5dab56bb.en.html
> > http://lists.debconf.org
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:16:11PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> These two messages describe our current monetary status:
> http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20120612.164231.5dab56bb.en.html
> http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20120612.183811.fb6f6511.en.html
If I'm reading them correc
Zack,
We would now like to request the use of the DebConf11 surplus for
DebConf12. See below.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 09:10:32PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:19:03PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> > I have (unfortunately for my productivity) started looking at
> >
