At 1157449936 past the epoch, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 11:16 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Friday 25 August 2006 11:06, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > It seems, this wednesday 19 UTC could be the best
> > > time (for now).
> >
> > So be it... (as "discussed" yesterday on
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 13:12 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Minutes will be provided, aeh, when they are ready :-/
Ok :) I was just interested in what was said about the Final Report, if
anything.
> I have a log but I have never color-beautified one, if someone points
> me howto, I'll happily do it
Hi,
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 08:52, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> Was this meeting held? Is there a log and/or minutes available?
Yes, it was held.
Minutes will be provided, aeh, when they are ready :-/ I have a log but I have
never color-beautified one, if someone points me howto, I'll happil
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 11:16 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 11:06, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > It seems, this wednesday 19 UTC could be the best time (for now).
>
> So be it... (as "discussed" yesterday on irc..)
Was this meeting held? Is there a log and/or minutes available
Hi,
for all not reading IRC...
On Friday 25 August 2006 11:06, Holger Levsen wrote:
> It seems, this wednesday 19 UTC could be the best time (for now).
So be it... (as "discussed" yesterday on irc..)
> "BTW", please look at the agenda at http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7Meetings
> and add whats
Hi,
On Sunday 20 August 2006 13:10, Holger Levsen wrote:
> So I suggest mondays, (28th of Augst,) 19 UTC or wednesdays, (30th of
> August,) 22 UTC.
on which there were the following replies:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 18:18, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> 22 UTC not for me, but the monday is ok.
On Sunda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/20/2006 08:10 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:49, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
>>we have not decided upon a time and date for the next meeting yet. As it
>>should be either next week or the week after (I am in favor
Steve McIntyre dijo [Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 10:43:53PM +0100]:
> >> >> http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7Meetings has a very preliminary agenda
> >> >> now.
> >> > ping :)
> >> > So I suggest mondays, (28th of Augst,) 19 UTC or wednesdays, (30th of
> >> > August,)
> >> > 22 UTC.
> >>
> >> 22 UTC no
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:58:50PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 06:18:08PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> On 10752 March 1977, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>
>> >> http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7Meetings has a very preliminary agenda now.
>> > ping :)
>> > So I suggest mondays,
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 06:18:08PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10752 March 1977, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> >> http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7Meetings has a very preliminary agenda now.
> > ping :)
> > So I suggest mondays, (28th of Augst,) 19 UTC or wednesdays, (30th of
> > August,)
> > 22
On 10752 March 1977, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7Meetings has a very preliminary agenda now.
> ping :)
> So I suggest mondays, (28th of Augst,) 19 UTC or wednesdays, (30th of
> August,)
> 22 UTC.
22 UTC not for me, but the monday is ok.
--
bye Joerg
doogie: you ha
Hi,
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:49, Holger Levsen wrote:
> we have not decided upon a time and date for the next meeting yet. As it
> should be either next week or the week after (I am in favor of that week),
> we should do so somewhat soon.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7Meetings has a ver
Hi,
we have not decided upon a time and date for the next meeting yet. As it
should be either next week or the week after (I am in favor of that week), we
should do so somewhat soon.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7Meetings has a very preliminary agenda now.
regards,
Holger
pgpILnU2a
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 02:44:28PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> This year's schedule priority should be to satisfy the local timezone
> - You europeans have higher priority.
What he said.
> If we want AJ to join, we should consider starting at
> 21:00-22:00. Please, if so, _not_ on Monday.
If th
Alexander Schmehl dijo [Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:47:22PM +0200]:
> (...)
> So far we always met on Mondays at 19:00 UTC. (You can use 'date -d
> "19:00 UTC"' to transfer that to your local timezone, meetings started
> at an monthly intervall and more often the nearer we got to debconf).
So far, I'v
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:47:22PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
>
>If you would like to contribute to debconf and therefore attend our
>meetings as well but can't make it on Mondays at 19:00 UTC please speak
>up *NOW*!
Monday, 19:00 UTC is normally fine for me...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:47:22PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> If you would like to contribute to debconf and therefore attend our
> meetings as well but can't make it on Mondays at 19:00 UTC please speak
> up *NOW*!
I resume classes for the upcoming schoolyear on September 5. Starting
then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexander Schmehl) writes:
> Bonus points, if you can propose meeting times, which are okay for Bdale
> (I think UTC-7) and aj (UTC+10?).
I'm actually UTC-6 this time of year. Regardless, don't worry about my
schedule... it's pretty chaotic. Pick a time that's good for the *r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/2006 07:47 AM, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> During preparation phase for next DebConf meetings have been
> proven very usefull (and sometimes even entertaining ;)
>
> Since some people newly joined the team (or are about to do so), we
Hi!
During preparation phase for next DebConf meetings have been
proven very usefull (and sometimes even entertaining ;)
Since some people newly joined the team (or are about to do so), we
should see, if our current prefered dating scheme still fits.
So far we always met on Mondays at 19:00 UTC.
20 matches
Mail list logo
