On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:09:39PM +0800, cctseng wrote:
> Dear ChangZhou,
>
> Enclosed please find the confirmation letter and a list of the venue and
> accommodation NCTU will support.
> Do these two documents fulfill the request of DebConf committee?
> Please let me know if the committee needs
also sprach martin f krafft [2017-05-15 15:57 +0200]:
> I think you are referring to the currently valid CoC:
>
> https://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml
Ftr, since there's some confusion… this is the current CoC. The
original proposal is available here:
https://storm.debian.net/shared/RSXP
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2017-05-15 15:37 +0200]:
> I also don't like such list. First, who will enforce it? DPL?
> Anti-harassment or organizers?
This — incidence response — is in part what we have to define.
Someone needs to have the power to enforce the rules, attendees need
to display t
also sprach Laura Arjona Reina [2017-05-15 15:22 +0200]:
> The reason I said in my first mail:
>
> "The third paragraph, about the measures that can be taken, I need
> to think about it a little bit more."
I am sorry, I missed that.
> And after thinking more, and cate's comments, I arrived to m
[using this mail to reply Martin, so that I have all CC]
> El 15/05/17 a las 15:07, martin f krafft escribió:
>> The original proposal listed a number of potential consequences to
>> offences, among other more concrete incidence response processes.
>>
>> What's the reason you didn't include those
Resending CC'ing anti-harassment, so the anti-harassment team has the
whole thread.
Regards
Mensaje reenviado
Asunto: Re: [Debconf-team] Revision of DebConf CoC
Fecha: Mon, 15 May 2017 15:22:32 +0200
De: Laura Arjona Reina
Responder a: larj...@debian.org
Para: debconf-team@lis
El 15/05/17 a las 15:07, martin f krafft escribió:
> Dear Laura,
>
> Thanks for your hard work on this.
>
> One thing I noticed is that in 6.7 there's the phrase "dismissal
> from the conference". However, this is not mentioned beforehand and
> even though I am sure people can imagine what this m
Dear Laura,
Thanks for your hard work on this.
One thing I noticed is that in 6.7 there's the phrase "dismissal
from the conference". However, this is not mentioned beforehand and
even though I am sure people can imagine what this means, it does
seem a bit "out of the blue". Maybe just to me…
Th
Hello Cate
Thanks for dedicate time to this.
I'm attaching a third proposal that supersedes my former proposal.
And a diff respect to my former proposal.
Below I explain the changes, based in your comments.
El 15/05/17 a las 10:23, Giacomo Catenazzi escribió:
> Hello,
> On 05.05.2017 13:46, Laura
Hello,
On 05.05.2017 13:46, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Hi everybody
(...)
> I'm attaching 3 documents:
>
> The current code of conduct (debconf_coc_current.txt)
> The proposal that is on the table (debconf_coc_proposal2.txt)
> A second proposal that I put on the table (debconf_coc_proposal2.txt)
10 matches
Mail list logo
