[Debconf-team] Event "tracks" (was: talk submissions: wafertest vs. summit)

2016-02-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Gunnar Wolf [2016-02-05 05:43 +1100]: > I'd appreciate if we were able to add tracks to our current setup. > OTOH, we have sometimes defined tracks based on preexisting talks > rather than (or additionally to) the other way around... So we can > get to that point later on. Wafer does

[Debconf-team] Multiple speakers (was: talk submissions: wafertest vs. summit)

2016-02-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Gunnar Wolf [2016-02-05 05:43 +1100]: > Umh, I feel this to be just the opposite way. Yes, in DebConf we > usually have a one-speaker majority, but there are usually several > talks presented by a team of two or more. Requiring authors to > contact the team, and requiring us to act man

Re: [Debconf-team] talk submissions: wafertest vs. summit

2016-02-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Gunnar Wolf [2016-02-05 05:43 +1100]: > Video recording should also be included, it has been marked as an > important thing by several people. I'd go for recording > everything, but that's just me ;-) By this you mean the "okay with being recorded" checkbox? We are working on a solut

Re: [Debconf-team] talk submissions: wafertest vs. summit

2016-02-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Gunnar Wolf [2016-02-05 05:43 +1100]: > > The list of evnt types were: Ad-Hoc, BoF, Plenary (admin-only?), Social, > > Special event (admin-only?), Talk, Workshop > > Ad-hoc is not something we should offer upfront. Traditionally (and > I'm explicitly not including DC15, as I was not

Re: [Debconf-team] talk submissions: wafertest vs. summit

2016-02-04 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:43:19PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Besides that, I agree with the simplification. Explicit URLs can be > part of the description, I just checked, you can generate clickable links in the description via Markdown, like [I'm an inline-style link](https://www.debian.org)

[Debconf-team] Wafer scheduling and session length (was: talk submissions: wafertest vs. summit)

2016-02-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michael Banck [2016-02-04 21:51 +1100]: > We could mention a duration for workshops, but maybe it's better > to write something in the description (or CfP) that we assume it's > 2h by default but people should get in touch with content if they > need something else. > > This all assum

Re: [Debconf-team] talk submissions: wafertest vs. summit

2016-02-04 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Michael Banck dijo [Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:19:49AM +0100]: > Hi, > > I had a look at wafertest's talk submission page right now, it's at > https://wafertest.debconf.org/talks/new/ but you need to create a client > certificate at https://sso.debian.org/spkac/ > > For the benefit of people who do

Re: [Debconf-team] talk submissions: wafertest vs. summit

2016-02-04 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:58:09AM +1100, martin f krafft wrote: > > The list of evnt types were: Ad-Hoc, BoF, Plenary (admin-only?), Social, > > Special event (admin-only?), Talk, Workshop > > > > The list of durations were: 20min/45min/other > > I think we should merge the two. There won't be 2