Hi,
below are my own opinions, I am not speaking for the content team as a
whole.
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:21:02PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Four bits of feedback:
>
> First, are we sure we want to invite talks and leave it up entirely
> to the presenter, whether they can be broadcast by
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:08:57 +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I noticed in http://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml, that is required to
> be accepted by speakers in DebConf, that is still says "All presentation
> material should be suitable for people aged 12 and above."
[..]
> It could be ok if that
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> It use the word "should", not "must", so I interpret as: "Be inclusive,
> do not add *unnecessary* restriction on age".
While that is a good interpretation, being explicit could help avoid
arguments over which interpretation is the most v
Hello Enrico,
On 04.03.2015 13:08, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed in http://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml, that is required to
> be accepted by speakers in DebConf, that is still says "All presentation
> material should be suitable for people aged 12 and above."
It use the word "sho
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Because many of the things that I treasure most in my life might be
> considered by some people unsuitable for an audience of 12, I
> considerably limited the scope of my social interactions in Portland,
> limiting myself to only discuss techni
Hello,
I noticed in http://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml, that is required to
be accepted by speakers in DebConf, that is still says "All presentation
material should be suitable for people aged 12 and above."
I would like that bit to be clarified, for two reasons:
1. last year that rule was
