also sprach Anthony Towns [2014-12-09 00:50 +0100]:
> Sure -- and what Phil and Brian have said is the expected scenario
> is that the actual result of committing to $x in travel grants
> will be an expenditure of $y, where y << x.
Good, so we are all on the same page. I think the details should
On 9 December 2014 at 03:29, martin f krafft wrote:
> > A budget is meant to help you plan and make decisions -- so if
>
> you're expecting only 2/3rd of the travel budget that you end up
> > offering to be taken up, you want to be able to both (a) know how
> > much that 1/3rd is in actual dollar
Hi,
Minutes from today's meeting:
http://meetbot.debian.net/debconf-team/2014/debconf-team.2014-12-08-20.00.html
Next DC15 IRC meeting to be held on 2015-01-05, 20:00 UTC. Agenda at:
https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf15/Germany/Minutes/2015-01-05
--
Besos,
Marga
_
also sprach Martín Ferrari [2014-12-08 18:42 +0100]:
> > I think it would be best if the new teams replaced the sections
> > they now cover with an appropriate statement, and also made sure
> > not to lose people that way.
>
> The new structure is being documented at
> https://wiki.debconf.org/wi
also sprach Gunnar Wolf [2014-12-08 18:49 +0100]:
> I agree with this. I *think* we moved the "bits of the DPL" to be
> part of the programmed events in the venue because:
There could be two events. The dinner speech should be short and
snappy. It also does not have to be the DPL, but it is a nic
On 08/12/14 17:30, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martín Ferrari [2014-12-08 17:50 +0100]:
>> This one seems like a candidate for removal too:
>> https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf15/Teams
>
> I think it would be best if the new teams replaced the sections they
> now cover with an approp
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz dijo [Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:52:10AM -0500]:
> >Personally, I am leaning towards common plates or buffet as that's
> >more lively and the latter increases mingling and interaction. It also
> >solves the problem of portions which are too small/large, etc.
>
> That's also my op
also sprach Martín Ferrari [2014-12-08 17:50 +0100]:
> This one seems like a candidate for removal too:
> https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf15/Teams
I think it would be best if the new teams replaced the sections they
now cover with an appropriate statement, and also made sure not to
lose peop
also sprach Anthony Towns [2014-12-08 17:49 +0100]:
> I don't know why you'd think not claiming the funds is ever a bad
> thing.
Maybe I failed to express myself. I am only talking about the
situation where
(a) we have more requests than we have money;
(b) bursaries allocates money for every
On 01/12/14 23:59, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Hi everybody
>
> I guess now the DebConf14 is over we can everybody subscribe/send to
> debconf-team@lists.debconf.org only?
>
> and maybe close the debconf15-t...@lists.debian.org list?
This one seems like a candidate for removal too:
https://wiki.
On 8 December 2014 at 19:38, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> In the past, we've had people approved for travel sponsorship who
> then didn't claim the funds, including those who didn't even tell
> us. While I think that we should make sure that people know that
> this sort of behaviour will negatively
also sprach Philip Hands [2014-12-08 09:46 +0100]:
> i.e. take the sum that Debian is willing to underwrite DebConf
> for, and allocate it ASAP so that people can go ahead and book
> travel early, then as early sponsorship comes in, allocate some
> more.
This is precisely what we have in mind for
Brian Gupta writes:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:54 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
>> also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2014-12-04 11:49 +0100]:
>>> BTW we need also to discuss if we should (and how much)
>>> over-commit sponsorships (anticipating the missed reconfirmation).
>>> Some discussion already
13 matches
Mail list logo
