Several diverging comments below:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:13:30AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez [2014-09-16 22:19 +0200]:
>
>> * Publishing the list of accepted talks ahead and taking the time
>> to schedule seems to be a good idea. There are plenty of people
>>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:13:30AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez [2014-09-16 22:19 +0200]:
> For bursaries, we had a simple interface allowing us to vote on each
> participant with between -3 and +3 points. This would be trivial to
> do for events too, I guess.
>
also sprach Joe Alderson [2014-08-27 17:10 +0200]:
> According to my browser, your HTTPS certificate "cannot be
> verified up to a trusted certification authority". This pops up
> a big warning message the first time someone tries to visit
> certain pages of your site, so just thought I'd let you
also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez [2014-09-16 22:19 +0200]:
> * We must find a way to make submitters to make better talks
> descriptions. Bad or incomplete talks description made to waste
> a lot of time to both the talks team and attendees.
Yeah, I can see this very well. We should make sure that
also sprach Paul Wise [2014-09-16 13:16 +0200]:
> The Debian publicity team prepared a wrap-up DPN entry about DebConf14.
> We would like to publish it on the DebConf blog (Martin Krafft
> volunteered to do so) but would like some input from DebConf14 folks
> before doing so. Hopefully you are sti
