Hi,
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 02:06:40AM -0700, MartÃn Ferrari wrote:
> I think the job fair may be a good way to get more sponsors on board,
> and perhaps that we should limit our innovations until we see how that
> goes.. Maybe we don't need more money than that?
>
> In my opinion, I would slash
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2014-09-09 14:16 +0200]:
> Usually report workflow is: copy texts from previous debconf and
> adapt. So having all text in one repository I think would help
> having a more complete report. With split repository I assume we
> will use only last report, thus forgettin
Valessio?
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
On Sep 9, 2014 1:25 PM, "Brian Gupta" wrote:
> We have an obligation to design a full page magazine ad, that thanks
> our sponsors. Does anyone with computer design skills have time and
> interest to help out?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
> __
On 09.09.2014 13:02, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2014-09-09 11:32 +0200]:
>> I think it is a pity to split the repository only because of the
>> images (photo and logos).
>>
>> Could you split only at level DCX/images and keep the text
>> together? [and possibly in futu
We have an obligation to design a full page magazine ad, that thanks
our sponsors. Does anyone with computer design skills have time and
interest to help out?
Thanks,
Brian
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2014-09-09 11:32 +0200]:
> I think it is a pity to split the repository only because of the
> images (photo and logos).
>
> Could you split only at level DCX/images and keep the text
> together? [and possibly in future we should move images into
> normal DCX repo]
If that's the concern... git-annex?
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Hello Martin,
On 04.09.2014 03:01, martin f krafft wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The reports directory is 805MB. Unless there is a very good reason
> why this is all in one Git repo, I will claim that I overlooked this
> during the migration and would like to propose to split it *after*
> the DC14 final re
