Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf-discuss] [Debconf-announce] First videos are now online

On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:14:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:10:29PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > > the first videos are now online and ready for your consumption: > > > http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2014/debconf14/ >

Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf-announce] First videos are now online

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:10:29PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > > the first videos are now online and ready for your consumption: > > > http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2014/debconf14/ > > One of

Re: [Debconf-team] RFC: diversity and DebConf, calling for input

also sprach Richard Hartmann [2014-09-03 01:01 -0700]: > As an example "Person who is ~1.80m tall, brown-haired, and whom > I have not seen for a few years and would like to see again, plus > they want to visit Germany for free and only use Windows" would > definitely increase overall diversity,

Re: [Debconf-team] How do people feel about dispensing with the historical 1+ month break from organizing activities that takes place after DebConf?

also sprach Brian Gupta [2014-08-25 18:33 -0700]: > I've observed it over the years, and feel that if we can summon > the strength to stay engaged, we can use the extra time, lessons > are still fresh from DebConf. Absolutely! I also think we should have a hand-over day or two post-DC15, where t

Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf-announce] First videos are now online

Hi Richard, On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:10:29PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > the first videos are now online and ready for your consumption: > http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2014/debconf14/ One of the things I wanted to address post-DebConf14 is to make sure the event

[Debconf-team] Splitting the DC reports repo?

Folks, The reports directory is 805MB. Unless there is a very good reason why this is all in one Git repo, I will claim that I overlooked this during the migration and would like to propose to split it *after* the DC14 final report has been released. Yes, I will do the work. Cheers, -- .''`.

Re: [Debconf-team] old videos -missing!

On 09/03/2014 12:33 AM, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote: > I was trying to look into some old videos of debconf9 from 2009. I see an > empty page when I reach there. > http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2009/debconf9/ I see two directories there: high and low, which both appear to

Re: [Debconf-team] SteamOS video

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Jest Tutjest wrote: > Will video from SteamOS meeting > be > published? > > Could you guys please write to me when it gets uploaded? > > For next DebConf, you guys could make some kind of automa

[Debconf-team] SteamOS video

Will video from SteamOS meeting be published? Could you guys please write to me when it gets uploaded? For next DebConf, you guys could make some kind of automated "remind me when video gets uploaded" system. User enters his

[Debconf-team] old videos -missing!

I was trying to look into some old videos of debconf9 from 2009. I see an empty page when I reach there. http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2009/debconf9/ Is there something obvious that I am missing here? If you have any alternative links to debconf9 videos, could you please p

Re: [Debconf-team] Separating Speakers and hiding Participants/Attendees in Summit

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:44 AM, martin f krafft wrote: > Sounds like a complex solution to me. It would have prevented the current discussion at least. Times the number of eyballs who read it. All other things being equal, if two talks happen at the same time and both are recorded, I would pick

Re: [Debconf-team] RFC: diversity and DebConf, calling for input

Let's focus on this thread; having two is less efficient. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:35 AM, martin f krafft wrote: > Which is precisely what the wiki page starts with: what are the > benefits? I saw this email later so when I wrote my initial reply, I hadn't read the titanpad, or the wiki page. I

Re: [Debconf-team] Separating Speakers and hiding Participants/Attendees in Summit

also sprach Richard Hartmann [2014-09-03 00:31 -0700]: > Why not just allow them to set themselves to be visible to > Everyone, attendees, speaker, no one (just a number for statistics) Sounds like a complex solution to me. -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team

Re: [Debconf-team] Separating Speakers and hiding Participants/Attendees in Summit

also sprach Steve Langasek [2014-09-02 22:37 -0700]: > I also don't see the social value in knowing in advance who's going to be in > the sessions you've said you're going to be in. Surely, if they're sessions > that you've registered interest in yourself, you'll find that out when you > arrive?

Re: [Debconf-team] RFC: diversity and DebConf, calling for input

also sprach Richard Hartmann [2014-09-02 17:24 -0700]: > To avoid cross-posting, I think "diversity" is both a very worthwhile > concept and an overused buzzword. As a result, I would argue that we > need to specify what we intend by using that word. Which is precisely what the wiki page starts

Re: [Debconf-team] Separating Speakers and hiding Participants/Attendees in Summit

Why not just allow them to set themselves to be visible to Everyone, attendees, speaker, no one (just a number for statistics) Richard Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity. ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.