Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14

2014-06-03 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:13:14AM +, Clint Adams wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:52:39PM +0100, Moray Allan wrote: > > Personally, I preferred the original Portland proposal of trying a > > more interleaved schedule -- for me, having blocks of three days for > > talks / hacking and BOFs ju

Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14

2014-06-03 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Clint Adams dijo [Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:13:14AM +]: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:52:39PM +0100, Moray Allan wrote: > > Personally, I preferred the original Portland proposal of trying a > > more interleaved schedule -- for me, having blocks of three days for > > talks / hacking and BOFs just

[Debconf-team] DebConf 14 registration/alioth create new account problem

2014-06-03 Thread Kitt Tientanopajai
Hi, I tried to create a new account on alioth to register DebConf14 on May 31, but did not receive any confirmation mail from alioth. I mailed to registrat...@debconf.org but they told me that they could not do much help since they don't manage the authentication system. Please kindly help and g

Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14

2014-06-03 Thread Clint Adams
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:52:39PM +0100, Moray Allan wrote: > Personally, I preferred the original Portland proposal of trying a > more interleaved schedule -- for me, having blocks of three days for > talks / hacking and BOFs just recreates the DebConf/DebCamp split the > same as in other recent

Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14

2014-06-03 Thread Moray Allan
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 01:34:58PM -0700, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > Fri, August 22: Arrival day. Dorm check in available after noon. > Minimal hacklabs. No talks. > Sat, August 23: First day of conference. Opening immediately > after >

Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14

2014-06-03 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 08:14:01AM -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 08:07:22PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > > I won't argue more on this, as it will start becoming a flamewar if we > > > don't control ourselves ;-

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf14 Bursaries Team: update

2014-06-03 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Felipe, On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:28:06AM -0700, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: > On 01/06/14 12:11, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:46:54AM -0700, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) > > wrote: > >> A quick update on where we are and next steps. > >> We ar

Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14

2014-06-03 Thread Carl Karsten
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 08:07:22PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > I won't argue more on this, as it will start becoming a flamewar if we > > don't control ourselves ;-) Whether or not we are having a DebCamp > > should already be decided,

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf14 DayTrip

2014-06-03 Thread Carl Worth
Patty Langasek writes: > My plan for the daytrip is to bus everyone out to the Columbia River > Gorge[0], have a picnic lunch at Rooster Rock State Park[1] and view Vista > House [2] and Multnomah Falls [3] as the highlights of site-seeing. This sounds like a great day trip with great bang-for-bu

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf14 Bursaries Team: update

2014-06-03 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/06/14 12:11, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:46:54AM -0700, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) > wrote: >> A quick update on where we are and next steps. >> >> We are mostly done with the ranking/scoring, but we are a l

Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14

2014-06-03 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 08:07:22PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I won't argue more on this, as it will start becoming a flamewar if we > don't control ourselves ;-) Whether or not we are having a DebCamp > should already be decided, and we should work based on that. So I > won't fan the bug/regressi