> No I would not, but I would probably identify the important ones for
> each team, as you and Gunnar suggest, and I would also take it up
> with the other volunteers and get a feel for how reliable their
> "promise to volunteer" is. We don't want people willing to
> volunteer, we need people with
also sprach Steve Langasek [2014-05-19 06:04 +0200]:
> How do we want to go about ranking these volunteers, so that the
> bursaries team can make an informed decision? Should all
> volunteer requests be discussed publicly on this list? (I guess
> some people would not be comfortable with this.)
Hi,
> For DC14, we have budgeted for 20 people for two days for the pre-conference
> setup. I think it's time for us to start pinning down who should be part of
> this setup team.
> (...)
> This year, as mentioned previously, we also have a lot more requests for
> sponsorship than we have funds
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 01:34:58PM -0700, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> It doesn't look like we yet have a shape for how the days should be laid
> out over the conference. Steve put forward a strawman in
> http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20131001.175026.0a50b91b.en.html
> and AJ countered in
Hi all,
For DC14, we have budgeted for 20 people for two days for the pre-conference
setup. I think it's time for us to start pinning down who should be part of
this setup team. Like every year, we have many people applying for travel
sponsorship identifying themselves as volunteers, and the bur
