On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:38:24AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Richard Hartmann [2014-04-24 09:06
> +0200]:
> > Do you need any final review or are we good to send the doc off?
>
> I think it's ready to go. I am just trying to remember what we
> decided on the Debian Deutschland
I'll be there!
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:22:20AM -0700, Patty Langasek wrote:
> Good morning, everyone!
>
> A quick (very late) reminder that we have our local face-to-face team
> meeting tonight at PSU, room 130 FAB at 6:30. I meant to send out the
> reminder last week, but apparently snoozing
also sprach Brian Gupta [2014-04-24 21:29 +0200]:
> Unless I am misunderstanding something, I don't think DE-based
> sponsors team members will be approaching companies with the name
> of the local clearing organization, and it's likely they'll only
> hear the name of your e.v. on the invoice afte
I don't see any of this as an issue, but I have no problem with any of
those names.
Richard
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Richard Hartmann
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Richard Hartmann
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Debian Deutschland e.V. makes potential re-use easier, else it's just a
>> name of no importance. Toss a coin?
>
>
> After the question simmered some more at the back of
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Richard Hartmann <
richih.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Debian Deutschland e.V. makes potential re-use easier, else it's just a
> name of no importance. Toss a coin?
>
After the question simmered some more at the back of my head, I think I am
leaning more stro
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 06:53:47PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Hi Steve, et al.
> On 23/04/14 18:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I asked this question on IRC the other day, but now that we have a talks
> > team, I can ask you all directly for your thoughts. I'm expecting to get
> > conference r
Hi Steve, et al.
On 23/04/14 18:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I asked this question on IRC the other day, but now that we have a talks
> team, I can ask you all directly for your thoughts. I'm expecting to get
> conference registration opened today, and ideally the "call for papers"
> would follow
Good morning, everyone!
A quick (very late) reminder that we have our local face-to-face team
meeting tonight at PSU, room 130 FAB at 6:30. I meant to send out the
reminder last week, but apparently snoozing my reminders for these send-outs
results in the same behavior as snoozing my alarm for get
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:38 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Richard Hartmann [2014-04-24
> 09:06 +0200]:
> > Do you need any final review or are we good to send the doc off?
>
> I think it's ready to go. I am just trying to remember what we
> decided on the Debian Deutschland e.V. vs.
also sprach Richard Hartmann [2014-04-24 09:06
+0200]:
> Do you need any final review or are we good to send the doc off?
I think it's ready to go. I am just trying to remember what we
decided on the Debian Deutschland e.V. vs. DebConf Deutschland e.V.
cs. DebConf15 e.V. naming front.
--
.''`
Valid points; agreed.
Do you need any final review or are we good to send the doc off?
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
also sprach Richard Hartmann [2014-04-23 22:16
+0200]:
> How about we designate a proxy in the first general assembly?
> That's an easy way out. In case that proxy fails for whatever
> reason, we have a public Condorcet vote.
Philipp put it nicely: better elect into the board trustworthy
people,
13 matches
Mail list logo
