also sprach Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [2014-03-05 21:59 +0100]:
> After giving more attention to the bid's pages and reading
> emails/meetings backlogs I'm blocked by my current preference:
>
> #1 Heidelberg
> #2 Mechelen
> #3 Munich
>
> So it's very clear that the 2-options bid strategy makes things
>
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 05:17:27PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > I understand that the reason for the two German bids is that this would
> > allow the team to negotiate better conditions from the two options if
> > they win the
Le mercredi, 5 mars 2014, 15.58:50 martin f krafft a écrit :
> The wiki page says we should offer
>
> a description of the strong points in other bids.
>
> What's the purpose of this exercise?
>
> Also, is the "priority list" a comprehensive list of criteria to be
> used during the bid decisio
The wiki page says we should offer
a description of the strong points in other bids.
What's the purpose of this exercise?
Also, is the "priority list" a comprehensive list of criteria to be
used during the bid decision?
¹) https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/PriorityList
--
.''`. martin f. kra
Reminder: the DebConf15 venue decision meeting is tomorrow.
It's now a good time for the two remaining bid teams to post the
materials mentioned below to the mailing list.
Moray
Original Message
Subject: [Debconf-team] DebConf15 venue decision meeting
Date: 2014-02-21 15:18
