On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Moray Allan wrote:
> On 2012-12-10 09:39, Philipp Hug wrote:
>>
>> I mentioned this before on IRC before. In case we'd go for a reduced
>> price for SME, I'd prefer to keep it simple. (e.g. only create one
>> reduced rate and not three)
>
>
> That sounds more sensi
On 2012-12-10 09:39, Philipp Hug wrote:
I mentioned this before on IRC before. In case we'd go for a reduced
price for SME, I'd prefer to keep it simple. (e.g. only create one
reduced rate and not three)
That sounds more sensible to me, yes.
For this discussion with respect to recurring sponso
Hi Brian,
> In an effort to streamline the discussion, I'd ask
> that we table the question of whether or not to make changes for DC13
> levels until we can reach a consensus on whether or not to make these
> changes at all.
It makes sense to discuss this now for future DebConfs. But I agree
with
