On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Philip Hands wrote:
> If you do the latter, I think it's clear that you don't want any of the
> individuals to have a conflict of interest
My argument before was simply that we have by far a large enough supply of
people who don't want travel sponsorship, so tha
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:23:06 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Moray Allan dijo [Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:06:34PM +]:
> > > Select people that are, initially farthest from me (or from all the
> > > team members) in the web of trust, probably in small batches, as ding
> > > this one at a time will
Moray Allan dijo [Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:22:48PM +]:
> - In an ideal world, I don't think we would do travel money allocation
> completely independently each year. While a new method for choosing voters
> might increase the variation in results between years, making the problem
> less bad, if
Moray Allan dijo [Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:06:34PM +]:
> > Select people that are, initially farthest from me (or from all the
> > team members) in the web of trust, probably in small batches, as ding
> > this one at a time will take too long.
> >
>
> I don't have an opinion on whether this
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:44:42PM -0600]:
> > After the global team meeting today we want to revive the discussion on
> > the dates for opening register, and deadlines for (travel, sleep and
> > food) sponsorship application and talk submission.
>
> It's time for us to consider a b
