On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 05:07:25PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > OTOH, on a complex project, I know about the level of involvement some
> > people have on some topics. I don't know about many others. And yes, I
> > do let other voters' votes influence mine.
>
> Yeah, but you never know if other's
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Valessio Brito
wrote:
> http://debianart.org/live/
Can we get the older DebConf videos into this? There are a lot of old
videos that might still be interesting to people, but which are
currently hard to find.
There are a few other points that could be improved:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:11:29 +, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> > If you look at RecentChanges
> > http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges
> > you'll see the spam attack on our wiki has picked up.
> There *is* a maths test box on the acc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Or http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ReCAPTCHA
just sayin...
On 02/10/2011 01:03 AM, Brian Gupta wrote:
> How many users are registered overall? I'm wondering if we need to go
> to a manual user approval process, but that wouldn't work if the sc
How many users are registered overall? I'm wondering if we need to go
to a manual user approval process, but that wouldn't work if the scale
is too high.
-Bria
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
>> If you look at RecentChan
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:01:21AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Ana Guerrero dijo [Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:51:03AM +0100]:
> > > Hiding them to help people not be influenced by the previous raters
> > > sounds like a pretty good idea. The idea here wouldn't be anonymity,
> > > just to help people r
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> If you look at RecentChanges
> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges
> you'll see the spam attack on our wiki has picked up.
There *is* a maths test box on the account creation page. Maybe the
automated systems added support fo
Ana Guerrero dijo [Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:51:03AM +0100]:
> > Hiding them to help people not be influenced by the previous raters
> > sounds like a pretty good idea. The idea here wouldn't be anonymity,
> > just to help people remain unbiased and make independent choices.
> > Raters would know th
Hi,
If you look at RecentChanges
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges
you'll see the spam attack on our wiki has picked up.
It used to be there was one spam instance user+page created per day or
so. Starting sometime yesterday, it has picked up a lot. I used to
be deleting and b
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 04:28:15AM -0500, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:29:36PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> > Second, on anonimyzing the committee (the herb@ members): Not showing
> > who casted each opinion in Penta is near to trivial (heck, even a
> > small CSS trick would
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:29:36PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Second, on anonimyzing the committee (the herb@ members): Not showing
> who casted each opinion in Penta is near to trivial (heck, even a
> small CSS trick would do), although it does not gain us much. If
> people feel seeing other com
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:29:36PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> First, on anonymizing the requesters: I am _against_ it. It might seem
> I want sponsorship to favor the group of people we meet regularly -
> But no, I want to favor people we know and acknowledge have worked
> most and are most valuab
12 matches
Mail list logo
