Re: [Debconf-team] debconf10 budget: ballpark figures?

2010-09-02 Thread Richard Darst
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:51:56AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > But ... that was not the most pressing question I had :) Let's put it > another way. I just want to know how much of the "virtual" Debian money > that looks like we now have on paper [1], are actually "real". Otherwise > stated,

Re: [Debconf-team] debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference

2010-09-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 2. September 2010, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Hu? Please see http://lists.debian.org/4c7b06a4.9010...@tilapin.org ; > according to the header it was sent to the team list. I dont recall seeing this mail on -team. And for whatever reason, http://lists.debconf.org/lurke

Re: [Debconf-team] debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference

2010-09-02 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 02.09.2010 11:43, schrieb Holger Levsen: >> And in the end the "bug" >> was fixed, quite some time before you send your mail. > That info never made it to our list, I believe. (At least thats how I > understood the mails. And appearantly I was not alone with that.) And that's > why this

Re: [Debconf-team] debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference

2010-09-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 2. September 2010, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > And in the end the "bug" > was fixed, quite some time before you send your mail. That info never made it to our list, I believe. (At least thats how I understood the mails. And appearantly I was not alone with that.) And th

Re: [Debconf-team] debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference

2010-09-02 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 31.08.2010 19:45, schrieb Patty Langasek: [..] > Am I reading this right? [..] > 2) If you are unable to make the change, find someone who can and /do/ it. I can't believe what I read. If the intention of this whole thread was, to demotivate me from forwarding debconf press announcement t