On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:51:56AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> But ... that was not the most pressing question I had :) Let's put it
> another way. I just want to know how much of the "virtual" Debian money
> that looks like we now have on paper [1], are actually "real". Otherwise
> stated,
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 2. September 2010, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hu? Please see http://lists.debian.org/4c7b06a4.9010...@tilapin.org ;
> according to the header it was sent to the team list.
I dont recall seeing this mail on -team. And for whatever reason,
http://lists.debconf.org/lurke
Hi!
Am 02.09.2010 11:43, schrieb Holger Levsen:
>> And in the end the "bug"
>> was fixed, quite some time before you send your mail.
> That info never made it to our list, I believe. (At least thats how I
> understood the mails. And appearantly I was not alone with that.) And that's
> why this
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 2. September 2010, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> And in the end the "bug"
> was fixed, quite some time before you send your mail.
That info never made it to our list, I believe. (At least thats how I
understood the mails. And appearantly I was not alone with that.) And th
Hi!
Am 31.08.2010 19:45, schrieb Patty Langasek:
[..]
> Am I reading this right?
[..]
> 2) If you are unable to make the change, find someone who can and /do/ it.
I can't believe what I read. If the intention of this whole thread was,
to demotivate me from forwarding debconf press announcement t