Re: [Debconf-team] debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference

2010-08-31 Thread Moray Allan
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Margarita Manterola < margamanter...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think now is a good time as any to take a good decision about what > the long name of the conference will be, and have everybody use that > name everywhere. > I'd say that DebConf is the full name, not jus

Re: [Debconf-team] debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference

2010-08-31 Thread Margarita Manterola
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Patty Langasek wrote: > Am I reading this right? We're refusing to fix a bug that is WRONG in a > Debian-related medium because people supposedly proof-read it and said it > was fine? Seriously? The website has already been fixed, and it now says: "2010 Annual D

Re: [Debconf-team] debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference

2010-08-31 Thread Patty Langasek
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 07:57:14PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -=| Alexander Reichle-Schmehl, Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:38:42PM +0200 |=- > > So plenty of time to review, comment, and change. > The result, however, is still wrong. Can we fix it? Or at least the > parts that are fixable (the websi