On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 19:33 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I don't understand the claim that DebConf 6 failed. That wasn't my
> perception at all -- it had problems, certainly; every conference
> does. But I definitely think that it served a few valuable purposes:
[...]
Yes, this was part of my poi
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Feel free to propose a better time slot for meetings, but keep in mind,
> that we are an international project, which includes all those nice
> coordination and time zone problem ;)
>
> So far we have at least people from:
>
> UTC+2 (central europe)
> UTC+1 (great brit
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 16:05 +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Okay, rereading my mail, I think I should have phrased some passages
> less provocative (or not in a public at all, but in a private mail).
> However, I can't take the mail back.
[...]
Thanks for clarifying. Perhaps it was just as good
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 12:42 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'll go on now with Fabians original mail which started this thread:
>
> > Here is a list of such tasks that I am aware of:
> > * The Final Report
> > * originally my task, now a total uncertainty since a
> >
