Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
> unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
> signing party recently. This was apparently to belabour the obvious
> point that large KSP's are events where it is
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the core issue here is if we deem presenting purchased
> identification at an event designed to extend the web of trust
> acceptable behaviour.
I don't think anyone has said that it's satisfactory.
_
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But then again people could lookup say mexican IDs and visas before
> going to a KSP in mexico so they have some clue what it should look
> like.
Actually, in the present case, I believe it turns out that Martin
Krafft's ID was exactly what it cl
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This has opened a can of worms; because your transnational ID was as
> official as it could get. Most of us do not know what other countries
> consider to be official, and it's more of an intent and goodwill
> rather than scientific or legally binding o
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any act of deception, meant to exploit the weaknesses of the
> system rather than participating in a key signing in good faith is
> likely to have had this effect, yes.
That's true. What about Martin's actions, as they have been reported,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:57:55PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
>> > If I were to crack a key signing party, using Bubba's travel
>> > documents, I too would swear up and down the street that he in
