Richard Hartmann writes:
> Could the video volunteer peek into a dedicated question channel during the
> qa part?
This video volunteer couldn't -- dyslexia means that if I'm IRCing then
I'm not doing anything else (so not directing the video or mixing the
sound or whatever my job was supposed to
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philip Hands wrote:
> This sounds like a job for a new volunteer, unless people think that
> i.e. the talk-meister should have enough spare time at that point in a
> talk, but then it needs to be made very clear to the volunteers that that
> is part of the role.
Hi,
On Freitag, 19. September 2014, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Other ideas:
> * A good seat in the front with a sign "if you sit here, you're the
> IRC volunteer"
> * The talk-meister designates an IRC volunteer for each talk.
those two.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This i
* Holger Levsen [2014-09-19 11:09:24 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> On Freitag, 19. September 2014, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> > Other ideas:
> > * A good seat in the front with a sign "if you sit here, you're the
> > IRC volunteer"
> > * The talk-meister designates an IRC volunteer for each talk.
>
> those
also sprach Nicolas Dandrimont [2014-09-19 16:05 +0200]:
> For a few years (3-4?) CCC has had the "signal angel" role which
> is exactly this: sit in front, close to a microphone, read IRC,
> and relay questions.
At LISA, sponsored attendees had to sign up and submit summaries for
2 or 3 of the s
On 19 septembre 2014 17:17:45 UTC+02:00, martin f krafft
wrote:
> we could expect our sponsored attendees
> to do one or two of these, right?
I'm increasingly worried by suggestions that sponsoring grants should be
somehow "paid back" by those getting them, and I think we thould discuss this.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:29:46AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Richard Hartmann writes:
> > Could the video volunteer peek into a dedicated question channel during the
> > qa part?
>
> This video volunteer couldn't -- dyslexia means that if I'm IRCing then
> I'm not doing anything else (so not d
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> I think it's Okay to _suggest_ available tasks to sponsored attendees (as
> well as to all attendees IMHO), but I don't think it is Okay to _require_
> their accomplishment.
Agreed, thanks for bringing this up.
I also think that volu
Hi,
On Samstag, 20. September 2014, Paul Wise wrote:
> I also think that volunteering should be suggested (perhaps via a
> sign-up board/sheet at front-desk and a mention in the welcome
> mail/wiki page) but it should be suggested to *all* attendees,
> including those who pay extra to help DebConf
