[Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-06-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:41:52AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Then there's the issue of tracing who did an actual upload into the real > > world. A name on a GPG key is not, by any means, a

[Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-06-01 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:41:52AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Then there's the issue of tracing who did an actual upload into the real > > world. A name on a GPG key is not, by any means, an effective way to do

[Debconf-discuss] BOFs as Talks (was: For the next Debconf KSP: run a "pre-KSP" BOF before?)

2006-06-01 Thread Micah Anderson
On 2006-05-30, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed, this leads me to think that scheduling a BOF/talk *before* the next > big KSP, if it happens at Debconf 7, would be a good thing to do. > > I bet that we have at least one person, in the Debian gang, who feels > solid enough on t

Re: [Debconf-discuss] BOFs as Talks (was: For the next Debconf KSP: run a "pre-KSP" BOF before?)

2006-06-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 07:15:05PM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote: > On 2006-05-30, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Indeed, this leads me to think that scheduling a BOF/talk *before* the next > > big KSP, if it happens at Debconf 7, would be a good thing to do. > > I bet that we have