[shirish शिरीष]
> Interesting. While I see that it both has an upside as well as
> downside, has anybody tried any non-scientific runs to see how much
> difference does it make in an actual install using that option ?
I did some years ago on a slow machine, see
http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/bl
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> As we are getting near to Debconf there are two workshops I would like
> to see and both probably are part of Debian QA .
>
> 1. Installation report on installation failure
...
> 2. A related scenario is if some hardware is dead - AFAIK in
>
in-line :-
On 24/04/2017, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [shirish शिरीष]
>> 3. Net install for minimal installations - Doing full installations is
>> very time-consuming. Here the usb disks as well as ATA/IDE are both
>> bottlenecks and a desktop install takes at least 30-45 minutes.
>
> One way to
[shirish शिरीष]
> 3. Net install for minimal installations - Doing full installations is
> very time-consuming. Here the usb disks as well as ATA/IDE are both
> bottlenecks and a desktop install takes at least 30-45 minutes.
One way to try to speed up the installation a bit is to install the
eatmy
Hi all,
Sorry, this would be a bit long -
As we are getting near to Debconf there are two workshops I would like
to see and both probably are part of Debian QA .
1. Installation report on installation failure - At times when you are
installing Debian either on too new hardware or too old, obsole
