On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 07:25:38AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Latest update: don't take flights connecting through the UK either.
>
> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/21/uk-set-to-ban-laptops-on-flights-from-middle-east-countries
>
> Notice they didn't include the UAE airports in the
On 21/03/17 16:12, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Dear all,
> How are we to know if we are affected by the ban or not ? Most
> airlines, at least the low-cost ones I know don't have an e-mail id or
> even if they have, they don't reply. I have experienced it . I have
> tried the live chat option at some
On 22/03/17 05:51, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:34:10PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 03/21/2017 07:02 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> The Trump administration has a genuinely racist agenda
>
>> Respectfully...
>
>> Could we please keep politics out of any Debian list?
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:34:10PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 03/21/2017 07:02 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The Trump administration has a genuinely racist agenda
> Respectfully...
> Could we please keep politics out of any Debian list?
No.
Have a nice day.
--
Steve Langasek
Hi Steve
On 21/03/2017 20:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:29:17AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> There has been no indication that this is in any way driven by the Trump
> administration.
http://money.cnn.com/2017/03/21/news/airline-electronics-ban-explainer/index.html?sr=fb
On 03/21/2017 07:02 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The Trump administration has a genuinely racist agenda
Respectfully...
Could we please keep politics out of any Debian list?
I'd very much prefer if we just keep fighting for free software, and I
suspect I'm not the only one with that preference. D
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:29:17AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Looking at the laptop ban[1], it appears to target airlines rather than
> individuals and it could impact people going to DebConf this year.
> Some of the airports on the list (Dubai, Abu Dhabi) are transit points
> for many people
Daniel Pocock dijo [Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:29:17AM +0100]:
> Looking at the laptop ban[1], it appears to target airlines rather than
> individuals and it could impact people going to DebConf this year.
> (...)
FWIW, coming from Mexico, I decided to buy a >US$700 ticket instead of
a ~US$500 one, e
Dear all,
How are we to know if we are affected by the ban or not ? Most
airlines, at least the low-cost ones I know don't have an e-mail id or
even if they have, they don't reply. I have experienced it . I have
tried the live chat option at some of the sites too and at times have
found that what t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Le 2017-03-21 à 09:20, Jeroen Dekkers a écrit :
> At Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:29:17 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Looking at the laptop ban[1], it appears to target airlines
>> rather than individuals and it could impact people going to
>> DebConf this y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Le 2017-03-21 à 04:29, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
> Can anybody make suggestions about how to minimize the impact on
> DebConf and DebConf visitors? For example, could there be a
> computer lab or other facility where people can work without a
> laptop
On 21/03/17 11:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Steven Chamberlain (2017-03-21 11:21:30)
>> martin f krafft wrote:
>>> Do not fly via the US.
>>
>> That's my plan also, but:
>>
>> the article suggests that at least Royal Jordanian Airlines would impose
>> the restriction on flights to Montre
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:49:27AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I don't believe the media coverage; but if this really does happen,
> > hopefully everyone can find a flight/airline avoiding such
> > restrictions. My ideas would be using KLM (direct from Europe) or Wizz
> > Air (via Rejkjavi
At Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:29:17 +0100,
Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Looking at the laptop ban[1], it appears to target airlines rather than
> individuals and it could impact people going to DebConf this year.
It is a cabin ban, so it is still possible to put a laptop in checked
luggage.
Kind regards,
Je
On 21/03/17 11:10, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Daniel Pocock [2017-03-21 21:29
> +1300]:
>> Can anybody make suggestions about how to minimize the impact on
>> DebConf and DebConf visitors?
>
> Do not fly via the US. I understand this might mean the cheapest
> flight is not available
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:21:30AM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> martin f krafft wrote:
> > Do not fly via the US.
>
> That's my plan also, but:
>
> the article suggests that at least Royal Jordanian Airlines would impose
> the restriction on flights to Montreal despite *not* landing in the
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (2017-03-21 11:21:30)
> martin f krafft wrote:
> > Do not fly via the US.
>
> That's my plan also, but:
>
> the article suggests that at least Royal Jordanian Airlines would impose
> the restriction on flights to Montreal despite *not* landing in the US.
>
> I don't be
martin f krafft wrote:
> Do not fly via the US.
That's my plan also, but:
the article suggests that at least Royal Jordanian Airlines would impose
the restriction on flights to Montreal despite *not* landing in the US.
I don't believe the media coverage; but if this really does happen,
hopefull
also sprach Daniel Pocock [2017-03-21 21:29 +1300]:
> Can anybody make suggestions about how to minimize the impact on
> DebConf and DebConf visitors?
Do not fly via the US. I understand this might mean the cheapest
flight is not available to you, but some of the measures you propose
would mean a
Looking at the laptop ban[1], it appears to target airlines rather than
individuals and it could impact people going to DebConf this year.
Some of the airports on the list (Dubai, Abu Dhabi) are transit points
for many people from Asia going to the US and Canada or from Australia
going to Europe.
20 matches
Mail list logo
