Re: [deal.II] treatment of handing nodes in the heat conduction problem

2021-03-21 Thread Anton Ermakov
Yes, that part now works. Thank you, Wolfgang. Anton. On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 3:13:17 PM UTC-7 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > On 3/17/21 10:41 PM, Anton Ermakov wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. I think I got it. Basically, I had to manually > place the > > local matrices into the global ma

Re: [deal.II] treatment of handing nodes in the heat conduction problem

2021-03-17 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 3/17/21 10:41 PM, Anton Ermakov wrote: Thanks for the reply. I think I got it. Basically, I had to manually place the local matrices into the global matrix, without taking into account the hanging node constraints, which are later taken care of by /constraints.condense(system_matrix, system

Re: [deal.II] treatment of handing nodes in the heat conduction problem

2021-03-17 Thread Anton Ermakov
Thanks for the reply. I think I got it. Basically, I had to manually place the local matrices into the global matrix, without taking into account the hanging node constraints, which are later taken care of by *constraints.condense(system_matrix, system_rhs);* In the case of the mass matrix, I ha

Re: [deal.II] treatment of handing nodes in the heat conduction problem

2021-03-16 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 3/16/21 6:12 AM, Anton Ermakov wrote: I attach the minimally changed Step-26 code to illustrate the problem. It is different from the original step-26 in three important  places: 1) in the run function, the mesh is refined in a corner 2) in the setup_system the mass and Laplace matrices ar