Re: [deal.II] step-40. petsc with openmp

2017-07-12 Thread Kartik Jujare
Thank you for the answer Regards, Kartik On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 5:53:48 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > > On 07/11/2017 08:33 AM, Kartik Jujare wrote: > > > > Does this still hold true of the Petsc wrappers not being thread-safe? > > Yes. But it's not the wrappers that are the probl

Re: [deal.II] step-40. petsc with openmp

2017-07-11 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 07/11/2017 08:33 AM, Kartik Jujare wrote: Does this still hold true of the Petsc wrappers not being thread-safe? Yes. But it's not the wrappers that are the problem, it's that PETSc itself is not thread safe. Best W. -- -

Re: [deal.II] step-40. petsc with openmp

2017-07-11 Thread Kartik Jujare
Hi Timo, Does this still hold true of the Petsc wrappers not being thread-safe? Regards, Kartik Jujare On Friday, March 14, 2014 at 3:24:18 PM UTC+1, Timo Heister wrote: > > > I am trying to use openmp in the element assemble procedure of step-40. > Has > > anyone done this before? Any advice