Re: [deal.II] Re: Step-8 Extension : Unable to modify BCs with face iterator

2021-03-25 Thread Pushkar Pandit
Dear Bruno Thanks for clarifying that as I am using 9.0.0 version .I will look into it and update my version of it. Regards Pushkar On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 6:24 PM Bruno Turcksin wrote: > Pushkar, > > Which version of deal.II are you using? That function was introduced in > version 9.1. > > He

[deal.II] Re: Step-8 Extension : Unable to modify BCs with face iterator

2021-03-25 Thread Bruno Turcksin
Pushkar, Which version of deal.II are you using? That function was introduced in version 9.1. Here is the documentation to the constructor of the Bessel functio: https://dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/classFunctions_1_1Bessel1.html#ac102d190a35cfc17f1876c82bab41004 Is the documentation u

Re: [deal.II] Re: step-8

2018-08-28 Thread chandra sekhar yaswanth devarakonda
Thank you.Thats really helped On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 1:18 AM Loylick wrote: > Essentially, there is no need in changing anything in assemble_system > function from step-8, > at least for stiffness matrix. You should change boundary conditions and > triangulation to suit for your task, > that is a

[deal.II] Re: step-8

2018-08-28 Thread Loylick
Essentially, there is no need in changing anything in assemble_system function from step-8, at least for stiffness matrix. You should change boundary conditions and triangulation to suit for your task, that is all. However you should not mix up Young's modulus with Lame parameters which are us

[deal.II] Re: step-8

2018-08-28 Thread Loylick
Essentially There is no need in changing anything in assemble_system function from step-8. At least for stiffness matrix, you should change boundary conditions and triangulation to suit for your task, that is all. However you should not mix up Young's modulus with Lame parameters which are use