Re: [deal.II] Re: New: step-57

2017-03-27 Thread Timo Heister
> I have presented the formulations for time-dependent NS equations in the way > you have done in step-57. Is it reasonable or you have a better suggestion? I am not sure I understand your question. You can extend step-57 to be time dependent but you could also start from step-22, step-26, etc. S

Re: [deal.II] Re: New: step-57

2017-03-26 Thread Jack
Hi Timo, Thanks for your help. I have presented the formulations for time-dependent NS equations in the way you have done in step-57. Is it reasonable or you have a better suggestion? Thanks very much for your advices and help.

Re: [deal.II] Re: New: step-57

2017-03-26 Thread Timo Heister
>> Is it possible to extend your code to time dependent Navier-Stokes >> equations? Certainly, but one could also start from one of the Stokes examples. I don't know if starting from step-57 is the best approach for you, because one would typically use a stable linearized time stepping method inst

[deal.II] Re: New: step-57

2017-03-26 Thread Jack
Hi Daniel, Thanks for your prompt help. I'm trying to solve the instationary incompressible Navier-Stokes equations at not very high Reynolds number(~100). It seems that this kind of fluid should be described by Navier-Stokes flow instead of Stokes flow(Re<<1)[1]. The "Vector-Valued" m

[deal.II] Re: New: step-57

2017-03-26 Thread Jack
Hi Daniel, Thanks for your prompt help. I'm trying to solve the instationary incompressible Navier-Stokes equations at not very high Reynolds number(~100). It seems that this kind of fluid should be described by Navier-Stokes flow instead of Stokes flow(Re<<1)[1]. The "Vector-Valued" m

[deal.II] Re: New: step-57

2017-03-26 Thread Daniel Arndt
Jack, Is it possible to extend your code to time dependent Navier-Stokes >> equations? >> >> I want to solve the unsteady Navier-Stokes equations using the >> *Vector-Valued* method, but I did not get any good idea from the >> tutorial examples (step-22, step-32, etc.) for Stokes flow. >> > The

[deal.II] Re: New: step-57

2017-03-26 Thread Jack
> > Dear Timo, > > It is a very good example for solving Navier-Stokes equations. > > Is it possible to extend your code to time dependent Navier-Stokes > equations? > > I want to solve the unsteady Navier-Stokes equations using the > *Vector-Valued* method, but I did not get any good idea fr