On 5/3/19 4:14 PM, Doug wrote:
> Ok, so my initial understanding of deal.II was accurate. It all makes sense
> now. Although FE_DGP is spanning {1,x,y} in reference space, it is not
> spanning those bases in physical space. Instead, it is spanning some
> combination of {1,x,y,xy} with 3 degrees of
Prof. Bangerth,
Ok, so my initial understanding of deal.II was accurate. It all makes sense
now. Although FE_DGP is spanning {1,x,y} in reference space, it is not spanning
those bases in physical space. Instead, it is spanning some combination of
{1,x,y,xy} with 3 degrees of freedom, that only
On 5/2/19 7:26 PM, Doug wrote:
>
> Based on this, I assume that FEValues, which takes a FiniteElement and a
> Mapping, uses them to evaluate the Jacobian field instead of using a bilinear
> mapping as the documentation of Mapping suggests. So FE_DGP would only be
> able
> to parametrize the ce
Hello,
I am not sure if FE_DGP and FE_DGPMonomial is behaving as expected.
I had recently commented on a thread about distorted meshes (
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/dealii/ZSHIDbp7yfE). I am using DG
to solve a linear advection problem with a manufactured solution. A 2D
square with
