Thanks, Daniel. This is very helpful.
Best Regards,
Syed Ansari S.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 7:28 PM Daniel Arndt wrote:
> Syed,
>
> Yes, you should be able to use parallel::shared::Triangulation instead.
>
> Best,
> Daniel
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 5:25 AM syed ansari wrote:
>
>> Thanks Danie
Syed,
Yes, you should be able to use parallel::shared::Triangulation instead.
Best,
Daniel
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 5:25 AM syed ansari wrote:
> Thanks Daniel for your quick reply. Is it possible to solve the
> same problem with parallel::shared::Triangulation for dim ==1?
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 20
Thanks Daniel for your quick reply. Is it possible to solve the
same problem with parallel::shared::Triangulation for dim ==1?
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022, 8:18 pm Daniel Arndt, wrote:
> Syed,
>
> parallel::distributed::Triangulation is just not implemented for dim==1 so
> you can't run step-40 for the
Syed,
parallel::distributed::Triangulation is just not implemented for dim==1 so
you can't run step-40 for the one-dimensional case.
Best,
Daniel
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 7:07 AM syed ansari wrote:
> Dear all,
> I was trying to run step-40 in 1 dimension and encountered the
> error
Dear all,
I was trying to run step-40 in 1 dimension and encountered the
error corresponding to MeshSmoothing in the constructor. The details of the
error are as follows:
An error occurred in line <3455> of file
in function
d
