Re: [deal.II] Incompressible Mooney-Rivlin/Neo-Hookean material

2020-05-21 Thread Ester Comellas
Hi Navneet, I agree with Wolfgang's advice. Specifically, I suggest you start by double-checking the formulation you implemented in deal.ii. Surely, your Jc tangent tensor can't be zero! Also, shouldn't the volumetric part of your strain energy density be a function of the bulk modulus kappa, n

Re: [deal.II] Incompressible Mooney-Rivlin/Neo-Hookean material

2020-05-14 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 5/14/20 10:28 AM, navneet roshan wrote: Thank you for the response, Sorry, I did't put the precise question. My geometry is not deforming after first loading step, Is it locking behaviour? Do I need to give some special treatment to the incompressibility constraint? as some references sugges

Re: [deal.II] Incompressible Mooney-Rivlin/Neo-Hookean material

2020-05-14 Thread navneet roshan
Dear Prof. Thank you for the response, Sorry, I did't put the precise question. My geometry is not deforming after first loading step, Is it locking behaviour? Do I need to give some special treatment to the incompressibility constraint? as some references suggests using augmented lagrangian and u

Re: [deal.II] Incompressible Mooney-Rivlin/Neo-Hookean material

2020-05-14 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
Navneet, I think I'm not clear what precisely your question is. Are you hoping that we take a look at your code and debug it for you? Best WB On 5/13/20 11:38 PM, navneet roshan wrote: Dear Members, I changed step-44 and reduced the code to 2-field, results for 2-field and 3-field form