On 2/15/22 07:32, 'Markus Mehnert' via deal.II User Group wrote:
Thank you for your response. I identified the correct dofs by trial and error
which worked (9 dofs for a scalar quantity with quadratic polyorder).
However, when I use /"fe_face.system_to_base_index().first.first" /to
identify,
Dear Wolfgang,
Thank you for your response. I identified the correct dofs by trial and
error which worked (9 dofs for a scalar quantity with quadratic
polyorder). However, when I use *"fe_face.system_to_base_index().first.first"
*to identify, which base element these dofs belong to, it does no
On 2/11/22 12:12, 'Markus Mehnert' via deal.II User Group wrote:
*** Caution: EXTERNAL Sender ***
Dear Wolfgang,
Thank you for your quick response. The dofs per face are defined as /
/
/
/
/const unsigned int dofs_per_face = fe_cell.dofs_per_face;/
/
/
where fe_cell is the/FESystem/ that consis
Markus,
how do you define dofs_per_face? Do you adjust it for the polynomial degree?
Best
W.
On 2/11/22 10:51, 'Markus Mehnert' via deal.II User Group wrote:
*** Caution: EXTERNAL Sender ***
Hi everyone,
Instead of prescribing classical Dirichlet boundary conditions (i.e. the
values for t
Hi everyone,
Instead of prescribing classical Dirichlet boundary conditions (i.e. the
values for the solution field on the boundary) I am trying to impose the
values for a specific degree of freedom inside my material. My idea was to
iterate over all cells and their faces. Then I use the locati
