Dear Marc,
thanks for the information, I think I missed this merge in functionality.
The serial SolutionTransfer class just had the responsibility to transfer
vectors between differently refined meshes. How did you use it to load
vectors from disk? I don't remember that it had such a functionali
Dear all,
I noticed that apparently a change in the SolutionTransfer class is
coming with the next version.
Particularly, the function 'prepare_for_pure_refinement' seems to be
removed (was present in version 9.6.2 but is gone in git)?
My code presently relies on the possibility to utilize this
ious error that I am missing?
Even more critically, will this even accomplish what I want? I see in the
"merge_triangulations" documentation that " In particular, manifolds
attached to the two input triangulations will be lost in the result
triangulation."
Any help is greatly a
about the second, so that the issue
> isn't forgotten.
>
> Best
> W.
>
>
--
--------
Prof. Dr. Winnifried Wollner
Technische Universität Darmstadt
Fachereich Mathem
Dear all,
I encountered the following issue while trying to solve a Maxwell
eigenvalue problem in dealii v 9.1.1.
When using an FESystem<3> containing one FENedelec and other elements and
trying to set boundary values
via
VectorTools::project_boundary_values_curl_conforming_l2
where the argum
Dear Wolfgang,
sure, I have posted a corresponding example.
Best
Winni
Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2017 17:54:58 UTC+2 schrieb Wolfgang Bangerth:
>
>
> Hi Winni,
>
> > when adjusting my own code to deal.ii version 8.5. I noticed a change in
> > the behavior of the FETools::extrapolate method.
>
Dear all,
when adjusting my own code to deal.ii version 8.5. I noticed a change in
the behavior of the FETools::extrapolate method.
Since I could not find this in the list of changes, I would like to let
you know as this might have been unintended.
Description:
Until 8.4.1 FETools::extrapolate ha
