Re: [deal.II] PETScWrappers::MPI::BlockVector with Direct Solver

2020-09-03 Thread Mauro Murer
Ok. Thanks a lot! Il mer 2 set 2020, 17:29 Wolfgang Bangerth ha scritto: > On 9/2/20 8:49 AM, mau@gmail.com wrote: > > > > I have read the documentation but I didn't find anything related to > using > > BlockVector from PETScWrappers with a Direct Solver, for instance > > SolverPreOnly shoul

Re: [deal.II] assemble matrix after mesh refinement

2019-10-21 Thread Mauro Murer
ls() Additional information: This function only works for quadratic objects! Il giorno lun 21 ott 2019 alle ore 16:35 Wolfgang Bangerth < bange...@colostate.edu> ha scritto: > On 10/21/19 8:32 AM, Mauro Murer wrote: > > Actually I can't find the function AffineConstrai

Re: [deal.II] assemble matrix after mesh refinement

2019-10-21 Thread Mauro Murer
g Bangerth < bange...@colostate.edu> ha scritto: > On 10/21/19 2:55 AM, Mauro Murer wrote: > > > > I tried to take constraints into account in the sparsity pattern, but I > don't > > know how to do it for a rectangular matrix such in my case. > > I have rows equal

Re: [deal.II] assemble matrix after mesh refinement

2019-10-21 Thread Mauro Murer
te.edu> ha scritto: > On 10/15/19 1:55 AM, Mauro Murer wrote: > > s in the system matrices. > > All went well until I tried to implement a mesh refinement. > > In particular, when I assemble the gradient operator after the > refinement of > > the mesh (increas

[deal.II] assemble matrix after mesh refinement

2019-10-15 Thread Mauro Murer
Hello everyone! I'm trying to rewrite Step-35 (Navier-Stokes tutorial) without splitting the implementation for component (In Step 35 one thread resolve the x component and the other one the y component). Proceeding in this way I can use "AffineConstraints" class to manipulate constraints in