Re: [deal.II] How can I reconfigure deal.IIConfig.cmake?

2024-03-15 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
Hi Kyle, Disclaimer: I'm not an expert in C++, but have some experience in maintaining packages, including ones of C++ software. First, it's a bad idea to patch *Config.cmake files, they are meant to accurately describe the currently installed software. This is especially important because GCC an

Re: [deal.II] Wave equation in temporal domain

2023-02-07 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 19:17 -0700, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > On 1/16/23 06:29, Alexander Kiselyov wrote: > > I'm trying to solve inhomogeneous Maxwellian equations in 4- > > potential > > form in 3D space. In terms of math it is equivalent to solving a > > system

[deal.II] Wave equation in temporal domain

2023-01-16 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
Dear deal.II users and developers, I'm trying to solve inhomogeneous Maxwellian equations in 4-potential form in 3D space. In terms of math it is equivalent to solving a system of 4 independent scalar wave equations. I'm using "free space" b/c of Neumann type, calculated via solving an integral bo

Re: [deal.II] Re: Getting global DoF indices of a face

2022-11-22 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
t; > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 6:48 AM Alexander Kiselyov > wrote: > > Dear Peter, > > > > Thank you for the reply! > > > > The thing is that the input data is a FE_DGQ DoF vector, and I > > would rather not project it into FE_Q elements. The original plan

Re: [deal.II] Re: Getting global DoF indices of a face

2022-11-22 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
nly has DoFs in the cell. > Switch to quadratic FE_Q and then your idea with the dummy DoFHandler > to globally uniquely identify faces should work! Not sure why you > create a system!? > > Peter > > On Friday, 18 November 2022 at 18:30:38 UTC+1 Alexander Kiselyov >

[deal.II] Getting global DoF indices of a face

2022-11-18 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
`FESystem::max_dofs_per_face()`, surprisingly, returns 0. See the attachment for a minimal example. The problem persists when running on a single process. The version of deal.II used is 9.4.0. What am I doing wrong here? Is there a better way to globally identify a face? Best regards, Alexander Kiselyo

Re: [deal.II] RHS function represented by an interpolation

2022-07-18 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
Thank you very much, Jean-Paul! I have totally forgot that deal.II has a wiki in addition to doxygen documentation! Best regards, Alexander Kiselyov On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 22:51 +0200, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > The answer that Wolfgang gave is the one that you want

Re: [deal.II] RHS function represented by an interpolation

2022-07-18 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
aving their own mesh refinement loops). It seems that in this case VectorTools::interpolate_to_different_mesh has to be used, am I right? Best regards, Alexander Kiselyov On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 13:36 -0600, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > On 7/15/22 08:36, Alexander Kiselyov wrote: > > > > Wh

[deal.II] RHS function represented by an interpolation

2022-07-15 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
e the B's solution to the FE system used to solve A, but there might be an RHS incompatible with FE_Nedelec elements. Which tools could be used to overcome this problem? Or is my approach deficient in general? Best regards, Alexander Kiselyov -- The deal.II project is located at http:

Re: [deal.II] Re: Using AMR with MatrixFree

2022-07-08 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
cell iterator from Triangulation or DoFHandler. Best regards, Alexander Kiselyov On Thu, 2022-07-07 at 12:55 -0700, Peter Munch wrote: > The problem is that ECL is not working with AMR, yet. > > A technical issue is that one cannot that easily loop over 2*dim > faces and compute the fl

Re: [deal.II] deal.ii installation problem

2022-06-11 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
Are you building deal.II manually? The default install path of manually-built software is /usr/local on Linux. It is usually write- accessible only by the root user. I recommend to use candi, it will install deal.II + dependencies in user-accessible locations, it is much easier than doing it manual

Re: [deal.II] Re: Vlasov equation integration issue (hyper.deal)

2022-02-03 Thread Alexander Kiselyov
move the discussion to: https://github.com/hyperdeal/hyperdeal/discussions. On the first glance, the code seems to be correct but I have one or two ideas how to simplify the problem so that it is easier to debug! Thanks, Peter On Thursday, 3 February 2022 at 12:12:20 UTC+1 Alexander Kiselyov