Re: [deal.II] Modules page disappears in online doc

On 1/18/24 02:06, Chengjiang Yin wrote: I notice that the modules page  has disappeared from the recent online documentation for a while and the module tab on the top bar is also missing. Does this on purpose or by mistake? The se

Re: [deal.II] Mixed codimensionality

On 1/24/24 09:07, Alex Quinlan wrote: I seem to have it working now, though I've hit some other unrelated snags that I need to resolve.  Once I get those fixed and confirm that my program is running correctly, I would be willing to work on a patch. Excellent, thank you in advance! Best W.

Re: [deal.II] Mixed codimensionality

Thanks, Wolfgang. I seem to have it working now, though I've hit some other unrelated snags that I need to resolve. Once I get those fixed and confirm that my program is running correctly, I would be willing to work on a patch. Thanks, Alex On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 1:00:51 PM UTC-5 Wo

Re: [deal.II] Re: element birth using FE_Nothing and FE_Collection in time-dependent problem with adaptive mesh refinement

On 1/24/24 03:41, luis miguel reig buades wrote: However, it does not seem to apply the initial solution I specify to the recently activated elements ( solution = 50.  ), it initializes them to solution = 0. Are you running in debug mode? The statement vector = value; is only allowed if

Re: [deal.II] Re: element birth using FE_Nothing and FE_Collection in time-dependent problem with adaptive mesh refinement

In general, it would be nice to have a complete code example to better understand what you are doing. Based on what you have shown, I try my best to answer your question: Your code transfers `previous_solution` -- for which I am missing appropriate resizing according to DoFHandler layout (e.g. `Vec

Re: [deal.II] Shape gradients of (f(x)*\phi_i)

Yes product rule (so broke can't even pay attention D:) This is a "In order for me to explain this I have to test it, but in order to test this I have to explain it" situation so to answer the why but extremely poorly: It is common in the spectral element community to use Gauss-Lobatto quadratu

Re: [deal.II] Re: element birth using FE_Nothing and FE_Collection in time-dependent problem with adaptive mesh refinement

That worked! And it was fairly easy to implement. Thank you very much Magdalena. However, it does not seem to apply the initial solution I specify to the recently activated elements ( solution = 50. ), it initializes them to solution = 0. This is how I am doing it: parallel::distributed::S