That's great. Thanks! :)
在2022年10月24日星期一 UTC+8 23:36:44 写道：
> On 10/16/22 01:45, 'yy.wayne' via deal.II User Group wrote:
> > *** Caution: EXTERNAL Sender ***
> >
> > I'm currently using deal.II 9.4.0 version (virtual box 1.22). When I
> > read a comsol mphtxt mesh(attached below, a 2D plane in
On 10/24/22 13:16, Мария Бронзова wrote:
*** Caution: EXTERNAL Sender ***
Dear all,
I have been trying to implement orthotropic elasticity (similar as in
step-18) and in order to verify my results I decided to set all E and G
modulus values as in an isotropic case and to compare the outcome w
Dear all,
I have been trying to implement orthotropic elasticity (similar as in
step-18) and in order to verify my results I decided to set all E and G
modulus values as in an isotropic case and to compare the outcome with the
one for the same isotropic elastic problem but with another formulat
Sorry that I come back to this again, but I would appreciate your feedback
to the issue I am confronted with:
" You would generally choose the (normalizes) eigenvectors of the J^T J
you have as the unit directions and the new set of parameters are then
multipliers for these directions. (So far you
On 10/16/22 01:45, 'yy.wayne' via deal.II User Group wrote:
*** Caution: EXTERNAL Sender ***
I'm currently using deal.II 9.4.0 version (virtual box 1.22). When I
read a comsol mphtxt mesh(attached below, a 2D plane in 3D space), it
throws an error on grid_in.cc line 1557 that s!="4 Mesh".
I
Thank you Sebastian and thank you for your new contribution. I will keep on
focusing on your paper for better understanding of this work!
So if the 3-D cases are consisted of structed meshes, the oritention is,
all-appearance, not conflicted, the computation of such mesh works as well
as the ada
Yes, the FE_Nedelec elements will work for not-so-complicated meshes, for
example, a simple cube will work just fine.
Best,
Sebastian
Vinta Yinda Wang schrieb am Montag, 24. Oktober 2022 um 10:52:19 UTC+2:
> Thank you Wolfgang and thank you Alexander!
> In the Todo list of FE_Nedelec, 3-D cases
Thank you Wolfgang and thank you Alexander!
In the Todo list of FE_Nedelec, 3-D cases ought to be carefully treated,
because (from my understanding) some complex geometries in 3-D with
non-standard grids (maybe unstructed or distorted initially) will introduce
sign conflict issues present in tra
Hello everyone,
I recently finished my implementation of hanging nodes for the FE_NedelecSZ
class with arbitrary polynomial degrees for the 2-D and 3-D cases. I will
submit my implementation soon to deal.II on GitHub, but as the
implementation was quite cumbersome and shall be part of my disse
Dear Vinta
for 2-D, you could consider resorting to FE_Nedelec, which supports hanging
nodes. In contrast to the 3-D case, FE_Nedelec should work even for (some)
non-standard grids in 2-D.
Best
Alexander
On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:46:32 AM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 10/23/22 0
10 matches
Mail list logo
