Re: [deal.II] Tensor product polynomials

Hi Gisselle, This error message occurs when you use a very old (probably GCC 4.8 or 4.9) C++ compiler with a version of deal.II built with a newer C++ compiler (or vice versa). A sure fix is to make sure you use the same compilers both for your code and the library. In practice, though, the ABI

[deal.II] Re: Periodic boundary conditions with AMR

Hi, There could be many reasons why your code is not working as expected. To find the problem, try to make the simplify the code as much as possible. For example, does the code fails if you don't use periodic boundaries? If it fails, try to simplify even more, for example, don't use periodic b

[deal.II] Re: Setting Element Order Independently

Bruno, Thank you for the quick reply. These look like exactly what I need! On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 5:03:36 PM UTC-4 bruno.t...@gmail.com wrote: > Shane, > > Yes, it is possible. There are two different functions depending on what > you want to do. If you want to set the order during setup y

[deal.II] Re: Setting Element Order Independently

Shane, Yes, it is possible. There are two different functions depending on what you want to do. If you want to set the order during setup you can use this function It is being used in step

[deal.II] Setting Element Order Independently

Hello everyone, I had a question about the possibility of setting directly the polynomial order of elements. In my problem, I have a priori knowledge about the order of the elements in my (1d) mesh. I would like to be able to loop over the active cells and then assign the order directly, rather

Re: [deal.II] Tensor product polynomials

Hello, I sent this message a while ago and things became clearer for me, but I am still not able to create the spaces that I want. My goal is to create local spaces that look like this: Q_{k-1,k,k} \times Q_{k,k-1,k} \times Q_{k,k,k-1}, for k \geq 1.This is what I am currently doing: - Created