I ran a test with a circular hole and a square hole. In both case I didn't get
what I expected (see images attached).
Eventually, I need to solve the problem on an irregular inner boundary so I am
looking for a robust method.
I copied below the code. I very much appreciate any help with t
Upon closer inspection, one can see that the bottom left corner looks a bit
"shaky" on the first 2 figures.
This is an artifact of plotting. What you are trying to visualize is a
bilinear function on the bottom left cell, but Paraview/Visit actually show is
a subdivision of the square cell
I was able to do it using DoFTools::map_dofs_to_support_points.
Best,
On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 3:22:02 PM UTC-5 Raghunandan Pratoori
wrote:
> Thank you for your reply Dr. Bangerth.
>
> I want to check which vertices are associated with the what DoFs. How can
> I extract them for each in
Thank you for your reply Dr. Bangerth.
I want to check which vertices are associated with the what DoFs. How can I
extract them for each individual vertex? I could not find any relevant
extract_<..>_dofs function to do it.
Best,
Raghunandan.
On Tuesday, October 5, 2021 at 10:06:02 PM UTC-5 Wolf
Hello everyone,
I recently started a project with different dependencies and I'm running
into an issue due to a CMake deal.II macro. I'm forced to use
'DEAL_II_SETUP_TARGET' as well as a similar macro from the other project
and the projects use different versions of CMake's TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIE
Always some errors are left after I wrote the message... errare humanum est.
I inversed the figure in the text, I meant :
"On the fig. 5, the bottom right cell has its form function different than
0 for dof =0 (angle dof) (i.e *fe_face.shape_value(dof = 0; point_gauss)
=/= 0* )
whereas on the
